If its actually affordably priced, it'll be the only one, so yes, it does. I honestly can't see a mainstream future for an accessory that costs almost the same as a playform people already call ridiculously expensive.
Im glad it seems cool but with that price point im significantly more hesitant to pick it up.
Interesting. Before the price point everyones talking about how you should lower your expectations because its just a small indie game and wont be the huge sci fi adventure some people think it might be. After the price point was revealed, suddenly it seems like people are flip flopping.
You're thinking of The Last Sasuke.
That's just silly.
Good for you, man. But there's a reason they made it optional.
True, in a competition between people, the players involved must all agree upon the rules so that it's fair for everyone. However, it's nonsense to compare something like that to this particular situation. XCOM_2 is a single player game. It's a game, a means of entertainment. There's no need or reason to play in any particular way but the way you want. You might as well say no one is allowed to play pokemon unless they do the Nuzlocke challenge.
You really think Nintendo is going to make a drastic change to one of their top franchises? Nintendo works by finding something that sticks and then adding small improvements, maybe throwing in a gimmick to work with their new crazy device. Look at Zelda or Mario for instance. They keep things interesting by making new dungeons and giving you new stuff, but the core of the game remains the same as it did in the 90s, because that's what people like.
You make it sound like they were designed so significantly better than all the others. Tell me, what was so amazing about the puddle of sludge with a face that was Muk, or the Pokeball, Voltorb and his upside down cousin. I'd really like to know what makes them the peak of pokemon in any way, as if nothing after them has been even close.
I mean, the whole point of games being games is that you can play them however you want. Feel free to save scum as long as you're enjoying it, though personally, I don't(Excepting the odd bug here and there.)
I mean, when it's Nvidias 4th most powerful consumer model card, it's nothing to scoff at, that's certain.
I mean, yeah pretty much. Though I can understand why many people prefer consoles due to their simplicity and exclusives.
Um, Im not really sure where you're getting these numbers, but you're pretty far off. There's an intro pack that costs $15, and then there will be 5 $10 packs, bringing the total charge up to $65. Alternatively, you could also just buy the full game for $60. Maybe you should do a little research.
I'm sure, given how the environment and world tends to be the only thing given any effort in most Ubisoft games.
...What makes you think a beta requires online components?
A lot of people keep saying this. That's not how it works. There's going to be content that's temporary. If you wait until after everything, you'll miss a lot.
The mark of a good story. /s
That's a pretty harsh comparison.
TotalBiscuit made an interesting video on video game criticism. One of the points he mentioned was that it's important to take into account who the person criticizing it is. Quarter to Three gives the same score to games like The Witness and Jouney. If you don't like such games, it might be best to take the reviewer's opinion into account. That sound, as I do enjoy those games, this is a great recommendation.
Easily.