Completely agree with you, well said.
Then you obviously don't understand what the purpose of a review is for.
I never said it was the only or even the main aspect of a next gen console but it's definitely one of the more obvious ones so why shouldn't it matter?
You're right but as I said, you can only have 2 hours per key and it can be split up for different session like playing for an hour twice or half an hour four times.
Good read and I agree with the fact that you don't need amazing graphics to make a great game. I play games to escape the real world temporarily because life is so stressful and it's nice to sit back, relax and enjoy a game with a great story and overall just plain fun to play.
Exactly, I don't regret buying this game for $50 at all but now that the online is starting to work (for me at least) I'm having a lot more fun with it.
I want this game to be successful and not get shafted for not being "an open world game" or "the delay wasn't worth it" kind of deal. Hope there is more gameplay footage from this too.
I can't report for some reason but this is a duplicate story.
http://n4g.com/news/1607263...
I'm really excited for this PlayStation experience since I really enjoyed the last one and hopefully we'll see more gameplay for Arkham Knight, Uncharted 4 and even Wild but did you really have to quote Tidux? This "insider" is known for stating the painfully obvious.
I've actually been able to play more online races when I tried yesterday so hopefully this because more widespread. The multiplayer / connective aspect is what makes this game for me.
This headline is misleading, you can split up the 2 hour session for each player but it can't exceed 2 hours.
If this is true, then this game and Arkham Knight will be taking over my June for next year.
As long as there's a market for remasters, companies will continue to make them. Also, as said in the article, there are people who missed out on ps3 exclusives (or 360 depending on the transition) so it give those players a chance to experience those games.
It wasn't an issue for me last gen because I didn't make my own purchases when those consoles launched and during the ps2 / xbox era, these kind of discussions weren't as big as they are now. Basically, I didn't really care much because it never effected me financially.
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" I'm sure people will enjoy this game when it releases but ever since their Watch Dogs debacle, I have to see it to believe it.
Gamers just expect value for their hard earned purchases (or those who claim to purchase it themselves). If I buy more expensive hardware and can't get the full benefits from it which includes higher fidelity visuals then why did I upgrade in the first place? It's not as important as some make it but it still is a valid issue.
Hopefully the multiplayer in this game will be more like Uncharted 2 with weapon pickups on the map and no loadouts or over the top streaks like most modern games nowadays.
The game itself is fun but I can't see myself playing it more than a few hours at a time. It's not really disappointing to me but the whole network issue that still plagues this game is.
It's really awesome that I can use remote play on my Xperia Z2 as well but I'll just stick with my Vita. Don't want to spend $40 on a mount.
This! I currently have a 8gb card and if you want to go fully digital for your vita, you need at least a 16gb card. However, if you don't want to switch out games from a PC, you might need a 32gb card which is sitting around $60-70 and that's on sale...ridiculous.