I would, it's an 81 on metacritic and theres a difference between critical reception and the active player numbers certain people want to use to downplay that positive reception. I get it, there seems to be a hatred towards Bungie now becasue Sony owns them and many were hoping this would end up like Concord did and are now unwilling to accept the fact that it clearly didn't. People can rail against it all they like, as I said it's not my type of game but there is no denying the f...
I don't assume that's why I said it's very possible. Possible: (adjective) is defined as something that can be done, brought about, or occur. It refers to being capable of existing, happening, or becoming a reality, as well as being potentially suitable or fitted for a specific purpose", as apposed to definite. In the end it's up to Sony rather it's worth doing or not, we shall see.
It's not for me, just can't get into extractions shooters but congrats to Budgie on turning around what was at one point apparently a dismal early beta and releasing a game that has been very well received.
"Revenue is the total money a business generates from sales before expenses, while profit is the money remaining after all costs, taxes, and expenses are deducted. Revenue measures growth and scale, whereas profit measures efficiency, sustainability, and actual earnings." 300 million in revenue doesn't mean they profited enough for it to be viable for them so Sony pulling back on it is very possible.
Asking who they should get to replace him is me "going to bat" for the guy? Ah yeah, ok. All I asked was if people think there are better choices than simply name one, I'd like to hear who people think would be a better option but look if that's too difficult for anyone to do that's not on me and it doesn't mean I'm going to bat for him becasue you don't like him but can't give even one example of who should replace him. T...
Ok so no real answer just childish trolling from an alt account becasue you're big mad the game has been so well received. Pretty much what I expected but I was giving you the chance. Might as well start thinking about your next alt user name, this one will be gone soon too.
"The 'noise' wasn't constantly telling me the games I liked were bad, and that I was bad for liking them."
We're not talking about the noise for other games were talking about this specific game and in a round about way by trusting the "noise" as it pertains to Marathon you are telling others a game they like is bad, and that they are bad for liking it. I get what you're are saying about game journalists but you have to realize the op...
But the "noise" is not skewed at all, right? It would seem the noise is aligning with your beliefs but what makes them any more valid than those of people who are genuinely impressed with the game? I think the bigger issue here is people were so desperate for it to fail, to be "another Concord" and now that that clearly hasn't happened they are doubling down on their dislike for a game that they haven't even ...
