AlexKoehler

30 frames on that demo and half 4k. peasants will always be peasants. if PS5 was that powerful it would have handled this demo at 4k 60fps. now since the demo is very demanding ands has a shit ton of polygons the ps5 was choking there delivering 1440p 30fps. other games will run at higher resolution but won't have the same details. peasants will always sacrifice visuals for more frames. sad

"I have no clue" lol yeah sure bud. and that demo was running at 8k 120fps with ray tracing on haha. it's such a shame they had to present a video with a dynamic resolution. 1440p and 30 frames without RTX.

the cpu is nothing special. it's capped at 3.5ghz. they can't even run the demo at 4k 60fps. so is the GPU. here's what Nick Penwarden, VP of Engineering had to say “When GPU load gets high we can lower the screen resolution a bit, and then we can adapt to that. In the demo, we actually did use dynamic resolution, although it ends up rendering at about 1440p most of the time.”

any idea why next gen didn't run that demo at 4K 60fps? maybe you should read the digital foundry interview with epic and UE5 devs. Nick Penwarden, VP of Engineering, said:“When GPU load gets high we can lower the screen resolution a bit, and then we can adapt to that. In the demo, we actually did use dynamic resolution, although it ends up rendering at about 1440p most of the time.”

You mean the PS5 cpu that was unable to handle a tech demo at 4k 60fps? They used dynamic resolution and ran the demo at 1440p 30fps cause the hardware wasn't powerful enough plus it had no ray tracing. maybe if RTX was on the frames would be 20 😂 cpu my ass

You take a look at the CPU and GPU specs and there's nothing special about them. The ps5 tech demo was forced to run at 1440p 30fps because the cpu and gpu were unable to get 4k 60fps as explained by Epic games and UE5 devs. They used dynamic resolution and guess what? There was no ray tracing. People expected 8k 120fps and instead they got half 4k with 30 frames and no rtx. So yeah cpu isn't a game changer

Simply: No , I think we all agree it's the SSD

they have over 100 million subscribers for Xbox game pass across all platforms. they're still gonna make a profit with or without hardware sales.

No one of you is winning. Xbox is running AC Valhalla at 30 fps and Sony gave us a tech demo running at 1440p 30fps. For me y'all the same.

I've been playing this game almost everyday. and it has stunning graphics plus it's so much fun. it's much better than Valorant

let's wait until we see AAA games. then we'll decide

why do I feel like this is 30fps

It's like the game that agony could never be. I was relieved when I saw it. I thought it got cancelled

I have nothing against Xbox but having two third party games doesn't make it "home for horror games" besides bloober team always release their games on PlayStation. Scorn will definitely follow it. Those games tend to release everywhere. You can only say that if the games were xbox exclusives.

They can't make shitty games better 💁

@MrNinosan you can't possibly compare a shitty game like crackdown to the medium or scorn. that game looks like the games you see someone play in movies. playstation fanboys missing on the medium and scorn is a big deal. even that Scarlet nexus looks like it should have been on playstation

we haven't seen anything yet. so far it's just trailers and teasers. we gotta see actual gameplay videos at 4k from AAA games. then we'll judge. right now we don't even have a propre gameplay video from both PS5 annd XSX.

on scorn website they didn't say ps5 or ps4. so does the medium website. but bloober team always release their games on playstation

so many playstation fanboys here, if you miss on any bloober team games you're screwed. The medium is not coming to playstation. and if you're a horror fan you should play scorn which is not coming to ps5 or ps4

pretty sure playstation fan won't be playing the medium or scorn any time soon. those two games are a must