i might play console games again on wii-u. aside from dark/demon's souls my consoles have been retired for years
don't have an orgasm ps3 fanboys, this doesn't mean more data in the game or that the game will look better. just meaning on the disc, which doesn't matter when you install the full game on your hard drive on pc. pc version will just come compressed and you uncompress it during install. trust me, pc version will still be FAR superior.
this might be cool, but this whole "its awesome because theres nothing to it" idea might get out of hand. people are praising things for having lack of story or leaving the whole thing open for interpretation.
i think lazy devs are gonna start using that for excuses to not develop a good story and people will see it as artistic.
i bet the phantom disagree has never touched the witcher franchise therefore not giving an accurate opinion.
i've played morrowind, oblivion, skyrim, and both witchers. the witcher games are on another level.
kingdoms of amalur doesn't have to compete with skyrim, it has to live up to the best rpg so far the witcher 2
i love good and unique MP games. but this looks like shit.
if your talking about duke nukem, they didn't delay it at all. it was delayed by another company they merely bought the rights for it, finished it up and released it.
identical caves. boring quests that merely involve walking somewhere, talking to someone, and walking back. blurry textures that are repeated everywhere. extremely lame combat, tons of glitches, old engine, 2 hour main quest where 1 hour of it was spent talking. yes they are lazy.
shh. don't say that to all the people that had skyrim as their first "rpg."
this game for me was one of the most disappointing sequels of this generation. i love morrowind and oblivion. this just failed on so many levels.
look to demon's/dark souls, witcher 1 and 2, and kingdoms of amalur for superior RPG experiences.
looking at at witcher 2 on ultra with uber sampling, and then looking at skyrim....it almost makes you laugh.
some companies can't. look at companies that had to close after a game that didn't sell
i think it'd be a good idea by msoft. less BS gamestop taking money from devs, more dev profits, better games, more risks.
might be fun but another military shooter isn't going to give tribes a run for its money anytime soon.
that explains the lack of any graphical options besides v-sync. oh well it didn't need any cuz it looked pretty sweet
just stop the fanboy war before it starts this time. of course if that happens most troll/fanboys on here will snap back into reality and realize they have no life outside of trolling forums
this unknown random site makes random claims from an unknown dev. lol yeah that sure is credible. all the proof i need.
demo was very fun. still on the fence over a purchase though. shooters of any kind sort of lost their magic this gen.
and what's funny is its roughly the same power as the new xbox. it might be the difference between a 360 and ps3. so you'll have to make the same negative comments about all next gen systems
a few more patches and it might finally become a finished product. keep it up Bethesda!
trying to imitate bf3 art direction?