but how are they suppose to react to it? Bobby is bluffing big time, we all know that, thats a lot of money left on the table if he does. Stringer pretty much said what a lot of people are thinking. Stringer's was far from retarded. Both companies benefit from each other, end of story
are sony suppose to act like they really suck now? Their arrogance is nowhere near the levels it use to be at the start of this gen. All companies speak as if they are trailblazers, but it seems sony gets criticized more often when they do it now.
I think it was a great thing that they acted arrogant and MS has done well with its machine, it lit the fire underneath sony's ass s they could get it in gear. Competition means gamers win. So i wouldn't expect any of these companies t...
you should cover it up, or pack it up till something comes out for it, no need putting it at risk.
I do go to that site but i agree, this shouldn't have been approved, you can even check near the bottom of that article with me disagreeing with Ben Dutka.
But if you agree that this shouldn't have been approved, then don't be a hypocrite, all the sony is doomed articles being approved is just as bad and those shouldn't get approved either. All 3 systems are doing just...
And im sick of the same old excuses. "MS still makes money off of you whether its for the 360 or windows for games lol"
PC is a way for gamers to play exclusive games from the 360, why do some 360 owners get so defensive when someone states " hey, i have a gaming pc, so i will get it on my pc"? I don't have a gaming pc so i have no choice, but im not gonna cry everytime someone mentions the pc versions
Just buy the games on ur 360 like i will and ...
Please, lets not pretend that the open world aspect wasn't a rather nice selling point for this game. I remember lots of people being stoked that it looked so good and its open world. But now that it isn't, all of a sudden the open world aspect is just a mere afterthought to some.
Pfft, whatever.
That being said, i do think its gonna be an awesome game and i think Remedy can be trusted, if they say its for the better, then so be it
Honestly, why shouldn't they keep this on the x360? They need to hold on to this as an exclusive console game, otherwise whats the point of having a console if your exclusives end up on the pc? Yes, im aware that its Games for Windows but wouldn't keeping this thing on the console help sell more 360s?
Sure, the upgraded visuals would be nice. I dont really care one way or the other but id think that all who really wanted to play this buckled down and purchased a 360.
Why would Bloodmask contribute this article talking about ps3 exclusives to look forward to this year when most of the games listed are 2010....oh i c what he did there i guess.
Seriously, i couldnt have been the only one to notice who contributed this...
It sold those numbers due to the bargain bin price at blockbuster the game had. Nothing more, nothing less, and no, its not because ps3 owners needed to pretend to have a halo game.
Damn you uncharted, you were the game that finally made me buckle and get a ps3 when you first came out, now look at all these sweet bundles coming out lately, but then again, it was worth it
online gameplay right? So you pay for its most important feature which would be gaming online right? ok gotcha, just wonderin
Edit: so if online gaming isnt the most important feature, what is? instead of phantom disagreeing, please explain
ApocalyPS3, what the hell does the blu ray drive have to do with this guys original post? did you even try to think about what you were typing at the time?
Truly you could have come with a better rebuttal to the op than that...
*edit* I understand what you are getting at but It still has nothing to do with Jdoki original comment.
I think its a great service and that ps3 players should be thankful that MS made it simply so it can light the fire under so...
i could see quite a lot of people going for this option instead of whats offered now if it was free. I would have to question anyone who disagrees with that idea
A better comparison would be: Both sides get a new york strip steak ( online gaming ) which would be the main course. 360 users would pay to get extra side items like potatoes and salad ( which would be the extra features live has ).
Now ur meal would have been free but because of the extras u a have on ur plate, the place you are eating from decides to charge u for the full meal.
bottom line is what most players want out of an online service is to play their games ...
not all games on live are p2p, some use dedicated servers last time i checked.
Live is a great service but i just can't justify paying when the main thing players really want it to do ( which is gaming online ) is free for others. The extras are great compared to psn but worth $30 - $50 a year? Thats up to the individual to decide
Not really a good comparison Steve...
When did this jump up in price?
i will have to repurchase this for the dLC, after i sold it, a week later this was announced, i was pissed,.....Bethesda you got me this time, its a damn good game, regardless of how they waited to release this dlc, i think owners of this game who are angry at bethesda should swallow their pride and grab it, i know i am
ur message notifications off right?
.......
WTF are you rambling on about? ( don't take that offensively )? its not like he is gonna buy a whole stores worth of ps3s, geez, most likely the guy is kidding...