CRank: 5Score: 10810

@Think Think Lol. You can’t be serious.

899d ago 33 agree4 disagreeView comment

Back in the day the used to call Eric Bischoff president of WCW, ATM Eric. Phil has become ATM Phil.

899d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment

I’m not surprised by this. I said the only reason they dropped the parity clause, was because they game became critically acclaimed. Phil saw that 96 Meta and felt that it would be a horrible look if BG3 was a console exclusive to PS and not on his platform. That was the only reason he did it.

899d ago 13 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Vengeance1138 This doesn’t have more power though.

899d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

IDK. But what I do know is that it won’t have all of those loading screens that Starfield has. 😂

899d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Why the hell would you want this to be co-op? How would that work in a story driven game? It’s sad that sequels can’t be made today without people saying “iT lOoKs tHe sAmE”.

903d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Shane Kim Not for a game that some people hyped as “The Game of the Generation”. Also 84 is low for Bethesda. If Rockstar or Naughty Dog got an 84 on their main AAA game, that would be a disappointment.

904d ago 19 agree4 disagreeView comment

It would be lower than 85, if it wasn’t for those sites with an Xbox to their name that gave it 9’s and 10’s.

910d ago 21 agree8 disagreeView comment

@Vengeance1138 Jim isn’t just “anyone” he’s a respected journalist and reviewer.

910d ago 7 agree8 disagreeView comment

@Vengeance1138 Yeah Jim is known to do this. I think his 7.5 of FF 16 is what brought the Meta score down from 88 to 87.

910d ago 14 agree0 disagreeView comment

@VersusDMC He also gave FF 16 a 7.5.

910d ago 31 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Redgrave It’s a bad take because he said being digital only is the reason they’re not selling. Also it is the industry now, the future is going to be all digital eventually. I don’t like it, but you dinosaurs are going to have to get used to it.

912d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment

Bad take. The GOW Ragnarok collectors editions didn’t come with a digital code, yet they still sold. Also the Starfield collectors edition doesn’t have a digital code either. That’s just the way the industry is moving whether you like it or not.

912d ago 2 agree14 disagreeView comment

Because these nerds kept bugging Bethesda about it. So they showed them a title trailer to shut them up. Even though the game wouldn’t come out for at least another decade.

917d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

Actually I would say Cyberpunk. Except that Starfield is much more polished than Cyberpunk was on consoles when it launched.

918d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

7 is not a good score from a game that was as hyped as Starfield, and from a legendary developer like Bethesda. Also it’s not just Howard and Hines that expolded the hype. When MS bought Bethesda, the games hype expolded 10 fold. Once Starfield became an exclusive, it was looked at as the savior to the platform.

918d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Starfield didn’t live up to expectations, but it’s not a “Flop”. Lol

918d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

What Sony is doing with PS Plus is scummy. But it’s not going to stop people from buying PS5’s and it’s not going to stop Sony from being the market leader.

918d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Christopher @lodossrage @MrNinosan Actually the game might of been worse without MS. Remember MS was the one who delayed it by a year and helped Bethesda polish it. Todd wanted to release this last year, when it didn’t look great. The game still has bugs, especially in the later hours. But it’s the most polished Bethesda release, and MS deserves credit for that.

918d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

MS paid for it, that’s how it happened.

924d ago 22 agree5 disagreeView comment