@JBroken
I never said it wasn't I just said there are other AAA shooters on the PS3. Killzone, Resistance, MGS4, Uncharted, COD, MAG to name a few
It is one of like 3 shooters for the 360 that sell tho. PS3 has plenty of other games but the 360 shooter crowd only knows of Halo, Gears and COD
Speak for yourself man, I wasn't the slightest bit disappointed.
Also Killzone > Halo. Reach isn't out yet and it doesn't look as good as Killzone 2 (about two years old) let alone 3 when it's released (CAN'T WAIT!)
You see... I like to play games when I am away from my home console. So that's where I disagree
"the articles title is true but for now only by sonys first party devs"
Exactly. Win
Talk to us 2 months after Kinect's release. See if any one still plays it after finding out the hard way that the thing doesn't deliver quite the way you imagined it would. Then your mini games and shovelware on rails doesn't interest you any more.
He talks, that's what he does.
@Disagrees, Please... Name me a game developer we hear more from. Molyneux spends all of his time talking about his latest projects instead of actually delivering on his own promises
Awesome mod, too bad the theme is based on a shit game.. Just take the Haze logo off of it and it becomes epic.
lol judging by the disagrees you hurt some feelings with that comment
Darkdoom, I couldn't agree more. I absolutely loved Crisis Core and it really explained a lot.
I was never really interested in the game, then after hearing about the half ass'ed PS3 version I had even less intention to buy it.
There is no reason what so ever for multiplat games to look worse on PS3 other than lazy ports and I refuse to support that.
I am going with move because I will end up with games I already planned to buy. I'd be buying Killzone 3, Socom, LBP2 and GT5 regardless of Move support so having Move as an option is nice. I don't want to be stuck with a bunch of shovel ware games that I don't play a few weeks later.
haha, I remember being the only person I knew with a PS3 for a while. Now not so much, most of my 360 friends either traded up or now own both.
"Technologically Kinect is a bit step above the Eyetoy, but in practice it gives pretty much the same type of games."
Exactly. They both have the same limitations without buttons.
"Paying to play online with friends or to use Twitter is ridiculous."
I have felt this way all along. I hope that this $10 price hike puts it into perspective for more people.
Yeah I though the same thing, this game doesn't track your body motion and accurately portray it on screen, it uses gesture recognition to tell if your body made the correct shape in time. When he starts adding in extra moves in between, the character on screen doesn't copy him.
Once again, the idea behind the game doesn't quite match up to what you actually get for your money. I am willing to bet this will be a trend for kinect games.
This looks like a damn quality game! I can't believe it's free!
All signs point to rushing the device to the marketplace which is a practice MS is familiar with
"The Kinect, on the other hand, requires an entirely new gaming vocabulary to interact with games; many tech demos are simply rail-based experiences. While the Move is brimming with possibility, the Kinect still suffers from many basic, unanswered questions."
Nothing but Rail games because Kinect's buttonless limitations
Stationary games and rail games are all you can do with Kinect, so you will be seeing different variations of the same kind of gameplay. Over and over again.