Approvals 10/3 ▼
mafia_pc (1) - 3616d ago Cancel
ElasticLove (1) - 3616d ago Cancel
ctate1995 (2) - 3616d ago Cancel
christocolus (2) - 3616d ago Cancel
trywizardo (1) - 3616d ago Cancel
TwoForce (1) - 3616d ago Cancel
Rookie_Monster (1) - 3616d ago Cancel
popopdc (1) - 3616d ago Cancel
520°

Quantum Break is performing better than you think

"After the review embargo lifted a few days ago for Rememdy Entertainment’s highly anticipated Quantum Break, reviews for the Xbox One version started pouring in."

Read Full Story >>
gamespresso.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3616d ago
Overload3616d ago ShowReplies(11)
Rookie_Monster3616d ago (Edited 3616d ago )

The most important point and a great statistic finding from this article:

"Of the 72 reviews counted in Metacritic’s average rating of 78/100, we found the following:

Only 2 reviews scored the game lower than 5/10 (Time and Giant Bomb both scored Quantum Break 4/10); the rest of the reviews scored between 6/10 and 10/10.The most commonly awarded scores landed between 81-90/100 (based on 27 reviews)More reviewers (5) thought that Quantum Break is worth a 91-100/100 score than those that thought it was worth 40/100. 2 gave it a perfect 100/100 (Digital Spy and IGN Sweden)

Overall, the data above shows that Quantum Break is reviewing well above average, with the majority of reviewers classifying it as a great game at an 8 or 9 out of 10."

Great minds think alike as I was just saying that the other day when arguing with hmmm, folks here on how Quantum Break is a bonafied great game and the majority of reviewers love it. That is what game reviews are all about, majority consensus rule to really tell the full story of ANY game. The 1-2 low scores get all the headlines and heat but they are just that, the minority.

Great article Overload, can't believe you are the one that found an article that supported my argument. A big thanks and I'll help you out with your Userscore and instantly approving this. :D

christocolus3616d ago (Edited 3616d ago )

I'm just waiting for my copy now. You can check out Xbox reddit.A few members there have played the game and some were kind enough ahare their opinions with us(no spoilers) and so far i'm quite impressed. Remedy did good. I just hope it sells well enough so we get a sequel to Alan Wake.

Geoff9003616d ago

It's a brilliant game, some wow moments in the game, and I really hope they do a sequel.

christocolus3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

@Geoff

Thanks for that man.Glad you enjoyed it. Can't wait to start my playthrough.

Black0ut3615d ago Show
Eonjay3615d ago

In totality, 78 isn't 'bad' especially when you consider the distribution of scores. And really, I think people do put to much focus into Metacritic. However, reviews are important and I think considering that this is one of Microsoft's big titles for 2016, some would have liked to see an average score of 85 or 90. Thats all this really is.

Bdub20003615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

78 is a good score, a game that should be played.

But to be realistic, it's a "flop" for what it is. Quantum Break was supposed to be a huge system seller, GOTY contender. 78 doesn't cut it for the goals that Microsoft had implied on this one.

I still can't wait to play it, I'm sure it's a ton of fun.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3615d ago
aconnellan3616d ago

As the author, I completely agree with your sentiment - I thought it was interesting that the only reviews being talked about or brought up were those that had scored considerably poorly, so I shifted focus.

Like others are saying in this thread, numbered scores don't normally matter - only when they're low, apparently...

jb2273616d ago

""Of the 72 reviews counted in Metacritic’s average rating of 78/100, we found the following:"

"The most commonly awarded scores landed between 81-90/100 (based on 27 reviews)"

Wondering if that 27 was a typo? The initial premise bases its finding off of all 72 in the text but that particular point only bases it off of 27. Was that a typo or what was the reasoning behind only taking 27 for that point? How did you choose which 27 you'd include? Just curious about that.

aconnellan3615d ago

No worries! So there were 72 reviews counted in the Metacritic average, and 27 of those reviews awarded Quantum Break between 81-90/100.

The point contrasts that only 2 reviews gave it 4/10, while a whopping 27 reviews gave it 8-9/10, and everyone seemed to focus on the 4/10s.

jb2273615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

Ohhh, well that makes sense, I was just confused about the wording..Cool graph work, it's nice to see these things visualized.

Some people are placing too much importance on the low scores for sure, even though they are so few in number comparative to the higher ones. I think the one hang up for me is that some people insinuate that those low opinions shouldn't even be considered or when they try to rationalize that those opinions are somehow false.

I personally don't place much importance on review scores full stop. I've played high scoring games I've hated & low scoring games I've loved. The most important aspect of any review is the text itself. Find a reviewer you trust and use them as a way to gauge interest. Review scores themselves are becoming more & more irrelevant to me. I think QB looks like a great game, and the only issue I'd have with it remains regardless of how well it'd be done. I just prefer to keep a controller in my hand while I'm gaming. Everything else about the game looks really cool.

rainslacker3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

I agree with Rookie as well in principal. But I'm really impressed by the amount of rationalizing that's going on with people trying to prove that it's still a good game, despite how some people feel about sub 80 being an average, or below average game.

I mean, is it really necessary to defend the score with such fervor? People actually interested in the game will see more than just the low reviews, and likely will seek out multiple reviews if their purchasing decision relies on reviews.

One could say the focus on the lower reviews will somehow hurt the game, but realistically, anyone reading the comments section of the lower reviews probably isn't going to be so oblivious to the fact that plenty of good reviews exist as well, and most likely understand that even aggregates like metacritic aren't the end all be all determination of quality for a game.

Is this kind of justification really required? The only people really going out of their way to really say the game isn't all that great based on the reviews...particularly those using the lower reviews...are those that probably aren't in a place to be able to play it anyways.

I mean, Rookie has gone to great lengths to calculate the numbers and put them in perspective. Why? People that are going to hate and try and use the low scores to prove a point aren't the audience for this game. What purpose does it serve except to make one look like they're just trying too hard? It's cool he does it because I personally believe that it's worth calling out people who try to misinform others, but at the same time, it's almost obsessive in practice.

Everyone else either agrees that the reviews are mostly good, and that the game is probably good enough, or at least concede that from what we know, the score is probably about accurate.

For my part, the biggest concern is the TV stuff, which I was never too keen with to begin with. Some of the game play elements sound less than stellar(repetitive time moves, having to get out of cover to shoot, somewhat lackluster platform type sections), but even the bad reviews don't attribute this to making it a broken game.

This of course doesn't take into account all the hypocrisy statements trying to compare QB to other games scores...because I don't feel that's the point of your article.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3615d ago
BiggerBoss3616d ago

Why do you worry about the score so much. It's a 78 on Metacritic. Nobody cares what percentage of that is below 5 or below 9. The 78 speaks for itself.

It's not a bad score, I don't see why you feel the need to defend it so hard when it's not really being attacked.

UnwanteDreamz3616d ago

C'mon man. Everyone knows why people get defensive about thier entertainment choices.

Stupidity

Before anyone gets mad I'm guilty of it too.

Computersaysno3616d ago (Edited 3616d ago )

It averages 78 rating spread across a now massive sample on metacritic, 74 separate reviews. Breaking down this data is pretty useless. It's the even spread you expect. No shocking anomalies. Tells us nothing more.

Across the massive sample, most thought it to be an ok game, good, not great.

That's it. No need to defend the score this extensively. No need to go into deep analysis. It speaks for itself.

I can't help be actually put off people that analyse game reviews scoring and then post articles all about it as if it's important or useful. As if they have nothing better to do. Comes across as very desperate.

Just play the game, or don't play the game. Easy choice.

super_bruno3616d ago (Edited 3616d ago )

Well if you eliminate the two lowest scores from GB and Time, the game probably would be 80 and people would be singing another song. The problem with metacritics is that lower scores have too much weight over higher scores, considering there is only two 4s and plenty of 80+ reviews.

Also people tend to take things out of proportion, if you think about it 78 is just shy of 80, like I said before the if the game would have received 80 people would be telling another story.

UnwanteDreamz3616d ago

That is how averages work though. Should they make up special math for game score averages?

Maybe people could just accept it and move on instead. If the game has mostly favorable scores it should be obvious enough.

Articles like these are only informative to the most uninformed and most unwilling to inform themselves. Who buys games based solely on MC averages?

Computersaysno3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

"Well if you eliminate the two lowest scores from GB and Time, the game probably would be 80"

But it wouldn't be, because the sample size is large enough it wouldn't jump 2 points. That's the idea of averages, more sample size = better. 74 reviews is a LOT for this game. It's a very broad sample.

Secondly you don't just arbitrarily remove the lowest scores. You can remove the lowest and the highest, but fiddling the data to suit your own argument is exactly why take it all or leave it all in terms of these reviews is better....

rainslacker3615d ago

@super

That would depend on how the weight is applied to the average. I mean, we don't know if certain sites get 2 votes into the average and that just ups the final number the total is divided by, or if certain sites get more sway to the score by adding up or down from the actual percentage based on what those sites rate a game at, or some other completely nonsensical form of score manipulation.

However, While it may make some difference with only 75 numbers being accounted for(I do the math down below), once more scores come in, it will have less effect.

Plus the reverse is true. Since some of the bigger sites, which are known to be be favored in the ratings gave good or high scores to the game, they will obviously bring the score up, and there are actually more positive reviews from higher weighted sites than there are negative ones, thus changing the weight, would likely just bring the score down.

Realistically, I only see 2-3 reviews 60 or below that I would consider sites significant enough to actually affect the score that much.

The mean average(what most people learn for calculating an average) without weight the score is 79.4

The mode average(most common result) and medium average(removing outlayers from either end) is 80.

In any case, since this weight applies to all games, it normalizes itself out depending on how one interprets the data. If one considers 7-8 a game worth trying, 8 to be a good game, with 9+ being an exceptional game, then it doesn't really matter that much when the end results finally come in...which will likely happen sometime next week.

starchild3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

@Computersaysno

It's not an even spread, though. It's clearly clustered in the 8s and 9s range, with a few extremely low scores bringing down the average.

On metacritic there are 58 positive scores, 14 mixed, and only 3 negative. Again, that is not an even spread, not even remotely. N4G's average is even more towards the positive end of the scale.

And, I'm sorry, but 74 reviews do not represent a "massive sample". It's a tiny sample relative to the millions who may play this game.

The distribution of the scores do matter. For example, a game that receives many scores of '9' and a smaller number of scores of '1' might have the same average as a game with predominantly 7s. Which illustrates that the distribution of scores can refer to very different kinds of critical receptions.

The main issue here, though, is not the scores or the average of the scores, but rather the way people are using those scores.

Many people are latching onto the low scores and using them to attack the game, and/or are focusing on the average and pretending that the average somehow defines an objective truth that we must all bend our opinions to. If there weren't so many people doing those things other people wouldn't need to "defend" the game.

Christopher3615d ago

***It's not an even spread, though. It's clearly clustered in the 8s and 9s range, with a few extremely low scores bringing down the average. ***

Well, yeah, low scores will bring it down, but not by much really.

AVG: 79.48
Median: 80
AVG w/o 3 lowest: 81.125

In the end, this is an 8/10 game and people should be fine with that. But, like every other game out there, you have high scores and low scores, but to only claim the 'low scores drag things down' without realizing that the high scores do the exact same seems very weird to me.

Computersaysno3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

@ starchild The distribution of reviews are't all 9s and 1s though are they? It's irrelevant to even bring that up when that is simply not the case.

It's clearly a pretty even spread. You can't have the highest critical reviews without taking the lowest and vice versa. Minor anomalous scores at both ends, remove the minimum and maximum scores and you still end up with pretty much the exact same average.

And I'm not sorry, 74 reviews (it's now 76) is in fact a huge sample.

Most games on metacritic are rated on much less than that and there are no complaints. e.g Fallout 4 has only 39 critics registered for Xbox One.

Stop moaning about whether it should be a 78, a 79, or an 80. Stop trying to fiddle data, argue about it, or complain about the odd 'low' review in your opinion.

That is why that great big sample is there, to even out the reviewers that got giddy with excitement and scored maximum against those who were having a bad day and rated the game lower. It's a waste of time to argue any other way.

It's a good game. No, it's just not the greatest thing ever for the majority of reviewers. And no it's unlikely to be a GOTY contender if it is voted by professional reviewers or the public.

Just play it and stop this tiresome and pathetic and desperate argument over a couple of reviews.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3615d ago
Masterofwiiu3ds3615d ago

The issue I have is that one of the low scores is Giantbomb. That's one of the few sites that I actually trust.

I'll get this game eventually, but not at full price. I'm juggling 4 other games right now, and Dark Souls 3 and Uncharted 4 are right around the corner. No need to pay full price for something that will be $20 cheaper in a month or 2.

Christopher3615d ago

I like Giant Bomb as well, but that doesn't mean they're always going to share the same opinion as me. Just they tend to share it more often than others.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3615d ago
daBUSHwhaka3616d ago

Me,myself will score the game when I get my hands on time on Tuesday.Far too many times have I trusted reviews that score a game high,just to be disappointed and low scoring games that I think were superb.Each to their own I suppose.Can't wait to play it regardless.

starchild3616d ago

Well said. That's how I feel about it too. And I've long had this view. Many of my favorite movies, games and books were not well reviewed by critics. Of course, some were as well. I simply don't find my opinions nicely lining up with metacritic averages.

Geoff9003616d ago

I have got it, and it's an amazing game, if you like Max Payne and Alan Wake, if you don't like those games then you won't enjoy this.

ninsigma3616d ago

Yeah 78 on metacritic isn't a bad score. Not everything can be a 90+. I think it looks great so I can't wait for it to unlock on Tuesday.

MasterCornholio3616d ago (Edited 3616d ago )

It takes alot of hardware to get anywhere near an 8 so that's quite an achievement for Remedy.

What I don't like is how people are manipulating review scores to make the game look better.

The game is good but not amazing. That's the final conclusion and people have to accept that. Not everything can be an Uncharted 2 or a GTAV in terms of metacritic. But the games that are not can still be good.

ninsigma3616d ago

Yeah I agree. Extremism goes both ways and trying to make out that a game is better than it is, is just as bad as making it out it's worse than it is. I don't follow reviews or anything, I make up my own mind but taking into account reviews we can see its critically been received positively. People who are excited for the game should be happy about that and keep looking forward to the game. Getting hung up on reviews isn't the way to go and gives journalists more power than they deserve.

Lamboomington3616d ago

"The game is not good but amazing. That's the conclusion"

Not really. Some people don't like it. Some do. Some really love it. Some hate it. Kind of expected, to be honest, the TV show especially was always going to divide lots of people on this

Imalwaysright3616d ago

"What I don't like is how people are manipulating review scores to make the game look better."

That's funny because I'm seeing quite the opposite happening here on N4g.

Cohagen4203616d ago Show
MachuchalBrotha3163616d ago

No people don't have to accept that at all. It got great scores from alot of sites. Metacritic just takes all the reviews and averages it out, funny because they dont have every score from every site or game journalist that has reviewed the game. Yet you and others swear by Meta.

3616d ago
UnwanteDreamz3616d ago

Who is swearing by Meta? Seems people are upset that the Meta average isn't higher.

Look above a whole article about it.

Gazondaily3615d ago

Ugh spare us the fake sentiments that are so forced.

Manipulating review scores? How? By actually drawing attention to the very scores?

"The game is good but not amazing"

You've played it have you?

One the most boring users around I swear. At least other fanboys who troll have some entertainment value.

rainslacker3615d ago

Realistically, the vast majority of games don't score above 90 on metacritic. I find it hard to believe the only games people enjoy are those that score over 90 on metacritic. Most games actually score below 80, yet many well received games score in the 70-80's on metacritic...particularly with less than mainstream exclusives which often seem to get scored lower than normal because they aren't super duper AAA kill everything in site type games.

From my experience, most games that I actually enjoy score in the mid-high 70's on meta, and some of them score 80-100.

starchild3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

@MasterCornholio

"The game is good but not amazing. That's the final conclusion and people have to accept that."

See, this is what I was talking about in my other response to you, and you're doing the same thing in this comment.

I don't think most of us have an issue with the scores. As Lamboomington pointed out, some people loved the game, some people liked it, some thought it was decent and some thought it was poor. Those are those people's opinions. No issue.

What most of us have an issue with is the way some are trying to act like the average of those scores represents some kind of objective truth about the game which we must all surrender our own opinions to.

Let me give you an analogy. Say we surveyed 75 different men on the street and asked them if they prefer blondes or brunettes. And let's say 55% preferred blondes and 45% preferred brunettes. Later someone reads of the survey in the newspaper and says to their brunette-preferring neighbor, "blondes are better than brunettes! That's the final conclusion and you have to accept that".

That is essentially the same thing many of you are doing. I hope you can see the error in that way of thinking.

MasterCornholio3615d ago (Edited 3615d ago )

@Rookie

I meant hard work not hardware.

@Starchild

"blondes are better than brunettes! That's the final conclusion and you have to accept that".

It means that out of that sample size of 75 men the majority believe that Blondes are better than Brunettes. Once you get a large enough sample size and collect it from the right sources you can come to an conclusion on what the general population will think. That's how they predict the outcome of general elections.

They don't just ask one person to determine what the population believes in because theres not enough data to do that. Instead they ask large sample sizes in order to determine the trends in which the population will vote.

That's how statistics work and that's how metacritic and Opencritc function. They tell you what the majority of reviewers believe by calculating an aggregate of review scores.

So when I rely on Metacritic to determine the quality of a game I'm actually relying on an average of review scores. Each individual review is different and can vary alot but the final result is what the population of critics believe in.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3615d ago
Show all comments (184)
40°

You're still overlooking this Remedy sci-fi shooter, and its 89% cheaper on Steam Deck

Before Control Resonant launches, you need to play Remedy's mind-bending Quantum Break, one of the best third-person shooters around.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community30d ago
190°

15 Xbox Games That Should Make the Multiplatform Jump

While there’s likely already a list behind closed doors, one can still speculate and offer logical suggestions for titles new and old that should find their way into the PlayStation and Switch libraries.

Read Full Story >>
technabob.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community712d ago
GamerRN712d ago

Single A games and live service games. Those make sense

S2Killinit712d ago

None of it makes sense. But its happening.

Ps5conehead711d ago

That’s up to Microsoft they want return on there investment. From buying up those publishers. That’s what there in business for. And they made a mistake putting day one exclusive on game pass. So now Microsoft wants to profit any way they can.its called buisness . Just like Sony putting games on pc a year are two after ps5 launch.
So if they can make money off PlayStation and Nintendo. They will do that. And I bet soon real soon they will release some aaa exclusives .and I bet one day it will be same day release

TheEroica711d ago

Sony gamers begging for Xbox games.... Who would've thunk it?

BISHOP-BRASIL711d ago

Yeah, because random site off the internet represents all Sony gamers, they have the letter of attorney and all...

S2Killinit711d ago

Lol what a spin. You dizzy?

AsunaYuukiTheFlash711d ago (Edited 711d ago )

We don’t care about shovelwares. Get that junk out of PS5

StormSnooper711d ago

More like MS begging to put their games on PlayStation.

TheEroica710d ago

Keep begging Sony gamers!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 710d ago
Friendlygamer712d ago

Some of these seem to be exclusive for lack of enthusiasm of the publisher rather than because of deals. A lot of cool indies skip ps for some reason like katana zero, el paso, elsewhere and gunbrela

S2Killinit712d ago

Even more indies skip xbox. We know that right?

Friendlygamer712d ago

Quality over quantity, Microsoft got some really interesting and curated niche games on their machines, maybe in part because of gamepass

S2Killinit711d ago

Quality and MS are not things you bring up in same sentence.

shinoff2183711d ago (Edited 711d ago )

Alot of indies skip xbox to. It goes round and round. Personally I think your off base on that but no need to have the argument.

Friendlygamer711d ago

Between katana zero, valheim, Battletech, el passo... I don't feel off base. maybe ps got a million of light novel games that will never release on Xbox but like I've said, I'm talking about niche games highlights, the 10%.

  Heck, it's probably thanks to Microsoft that the s.t.a.l.k.e.r games came to console ps included, meanwhile Sony backwards compatibility continues to be extremely anemic.

And I'm sure most ps5 users are happy to ignore these games and just play wathever new 3rd person action game is trending but it's cool that Microsoft gives some love to smaller audiences and software preservation

shinoff2183711d ago

Again your off base just to be snide. All it's showing though is your ignorance.

One light novels wtf is that even. Ps has plenty of pretty damn good indies.

Speaking of indies and ms being responsible. You know F.I.S.T. of course you do alot of you guys just support gamepass. Well here's a history of Sony being responsible for helping indies. Look up the China project from Sony.

Lastly lol your ignorance showing again. Sony has plenty of games. Personally third person is better then first anyway but that's besides the point. Sony gets so many games that xbox doesn't get because yall don't support the games. Jrpgs being a great example. I personally am not into every Sony first party game. Alot of us aren't. On the other side you don't get to eat often so you gobble up everything. Me personally God of War not my cup, etc. For me I'm into jrpgs and ms just can't touch Sony on those. Again because the Xbox base doesn't support it. Devs dont wanna waste their time or money. Hit me up when falcom develops a game over there.

Speaking of third person narrative games. Aren't yall drooling over hellblade 2. The first one was Sony exclusive at one point. Another not my cup game. Showing we don't have to fall in line and agree we love everything Sony puts out. The facts are they sell though unlike elsewhere(not nintendo)

StormSnooper711d ago

You are same person as GamerRN, yes?

Abnor_Mal712d ago

They really think PlayStation fans would want to play Redfall? Pfft.

Personally nothing on that list would be any game I’d want to play.

TwoPicklesGood712d ago

I’d absolutely love Hellblade 2, Palworld, and Quantum Break on ps5 as I’m sure tons of others would too. There’s nothing wrong with wanting games from another console and its sad that people try to act like they aren’t interested in them.

shinoff2183711d ago

While indont agree with the games. I agree with the point. Your not wrong.

DarXyde712d ago

Sunset Overdrive makes very good sense. Palworld might.

Don't know about the others. Hellblade II does make sense given the original launched on PS4 first. Quantum Break was a massive letdown for me. I absolutely hated the whole TV show thing and I don't think anyone should have to relive that on modern hardware.

Show all comments (31)
160°

Now that Remedy owns Control, it’s time to reclaim Quantum Break

Alan Wake 2 studio Remedy Entertainment has reclaimed the rights to Control, and now sci-fi hit Quantum Break deserves the same treatment.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community728d ago
Petebloodyonion728d ago

Totally agree with that especially when Quantum Break has several references to Alan Wake and Alan Wake make allusions to QB.
I do believe that MS and Remedy can work things out and MS has usually been nice to devs and publishers regarding IP.

Obscure_Observer727d ago

They can't "reclaim" what was never theirs.

Petebloodyonion727d ago

I’m sure we can settle for purchase from MS the IP.

Lightning77727d ago

MS is not doin anything with it. Plus they're doing a multiverse of their own so Remedy needs the IP.

If MS wants to have exclusive let it be timed for 6 months then go to other platforms. MS seems to be, let's say, generous with some if their games as of late.

Or have QB2 be multiplat from the jump, put it on GP. Keeping QB2 as an exclusive is kinda weird these days.

Obscure_Observer727d ago (Edited 727d ago )

@Petebloodyonion

"I’m sure we can settle for purchase from MS the IP."

Good luck

@Lightning77

"MS is not doin anything with it."

Japan Studio is dead nd Sony isn´t doing anything with Bloodborne either! Yet I can 100% guarantee that there´s a far bigger demand for a sequel, remake or even a remaster for that game from both PS5 and PC gamers.

That been said, why don´t you ask Sony tol sell the IP to Fromsoftware now that according to rumors, they bought Elden Ring from Bandai?

ZwVw728d ago (Edited 728d ago )

Reclaim? That would mean that they actually owned the ip at one point, which they never did (MS always has). Apples & oranges. Remedy always owned the Control ip (just not the publishing), as they have with Alan Wake.

About as likely as them getting the Max Payne rights from Rockstar.

mastershredder727d ago (Edited 727d ago )

Sending you game to a publisher does not mean they get "rights to own it " unless that was part of the contract (monetary/ strategic reasons). 505 was the publisher they worked with to publish and distribute it, it dos not mean that 505 flat out "owned" anything, clearly they did have a special arrangement that made them open to limit their publishing rights. and so here we are and big whoop

Jingsing727d ago (Edited 727d ago )

Yeah get Quantum Break PS5, only if you put it on disc with all the associated movie material.

isarai727d ago

I mean they got the Alan Wake IP back from MS, so I feel like they could get QB back as well

Show all comments (11)