I just played the game, as I downloaded about two hours ago. I managed to get a code for it, while at times it was frustrating to control it, it was def. fun. I do prefer the 360 version of Worms 2 still.
Ok BOTH, was trying to come up with something to reply to you with, so I'm speachless and will just say "Wow".
I can see it now, geeky fat kids running around lasering each other and getting tired quick.
I have not, what is it about?
Very true, I guess money talks. In that case, I'll take the Lancer from Gears of War, who wouldn't want a rifle with a chainsaw on it. :)
You witty Brit you, I guess you got me now. I wonder if anyone ever replicated Clouds amazingly huge sword. I think I've seen it, I might just go look for a youtube video and find out.
Heh, I'd like to see him make the Hammer out of wood, that would be an instant buy, I'd go around wacking people.
Yea, since it's Halo, people will do anything these days for game they love. Although I wouldn't mind owning one. Great job the guy that made it did with it.
And to know that EA is responsible for it makes it more shocking. I'm sure DICE was the developer.
I'm waiting to fix my stupid 360 to go on Live, this is the 7th time something has gone wrong with it, each time it's a different problem. I've been having to stay over at a friends house to play this game. It's been worth it, it's costing me beer though.
This review score sounds about right. Many have been giving the game 7/10 to about 8/10, a 5 scale is a bit different.
I never thought I'd be so addicted to WWII game as small as this comparing to a full retail game, but 1943 is a special arcade game, the gameplay still feels fun after all this years and the last time I liked a Battlefield before this one was 1942 since my college has the 1942 and we play pretty much every day, I was telling the fellas at school about this and ...
Agreed, something that has always bothered me though is a developer making a game not having an even 1k, but some kind of an odd number. I wanted my score to be perfect by 1k's but nooooooo.
Ahh I was such an achievement whore, I stopped being one right after the time they finished the Old Spice promotion.
@ Blaze
I'm going to give you a bubbles because you commented in something else than a report feature, lol.
Killzone 2 kicks ass.
Really! Wow, you missed some of the best games Xeall, I mean GoldenEye, a shiz load of Mario titles and most important Orcania.
I can't say the same thing. Metal Gear Solid truly got me into gaming, I loved the depth of story and gameplay. That's when I truly started playing a lot more, cause MGS had me playing for 9 hours in a row trying to beat the game as quick as I can.
Yea, a lot of you youngsters don't know, but a lot of the great RPG's came out back 20 years ago, they were in-depth I'd say more than today's RPG games, but in their own way, while they may have been shorter time wise they were definitely more in-depth when it came story and character development. And Zelda was the most deep at it's time comparing to other RPG's that were competing against it.
Like to a crackhead to me Peggle is just as addicting.
In my opinion arcade games did away with scoring just perfectly, the games were mostly short, so the replay value was in the score. These new gen games make it an additional feature or mode like in Modern Warfare where you have a reason to go through the campaign again to try and score higher, I guess ever since its existence the score was always meant for competitive purposes against others and to add replay value.