At the end of the day, it's ALWAYS about money. and not just to keep the company going, it's pure stupid greed. Corporation greed....
Perhaps I am not in the know, I see a lot of people saying games are expensive to make, they have to make money to make more games, etc. but...how many studios, or game companies have gone out of business here lately? can anyone think of any? in the last 25 or 30 years? not the ones that get bought up by bigger companies, just to shut them down and redistribute the talent. but actually went bankrupt. and had to break down, even back in the bush recession where major car companies were...
So FFVII was a huge game, it took so long to finish, I am a fan of huge games, I can get lost in a game for hours, but most can't. in fact I wager most people that played FFVII didn't finish it, and if they did, skipped a lot of content. it was long ass game, it could have been broken into sagas very easily. I don't think I mind them doing just that. I Think more people will see more of the game and it's content that way.
I just hope it has a slight...
Did I see a Goku/Broly fusion there at the end? Gokoly, or Broku?! o.0
@Rainslacker, I think it's the way they are presented, I mean the implied masturbation material magazine from the outhouse. stuff like that.
My problem is, when you have a game that has many characters, that are both male and female, the character designs for males are very accentuated towards being matter of fact, effectual to the game, and the females are created to appeal to someones sexual desire, stylized yes, but I bet it's really hard to fight a battle in s...
@Burce755, I think I would agree with you about that for the most part, except that all the characteristics you mentioned are admirable to the men who play them as well. with the exception of chiseled(Possibly). Guys don't mind playing an ultra masculine character.
the problem is, the sexes are not treated equally, if your gonna sexualize women, then you should be equally willing to do it for men, in the videogame world. there is probably a handful of male characters that are obviously sexualized. but almost all women, not all but a great deal of them, are sexualized
yeah how dare they treat men with the same sexualization as they do women!! I demand they go back to being sexist!!
so you guys don't get at all why this would be offensive? I mean, reducing a female character in their own game down to masturbation material?
If it doesn't bother you, then ask yourself why?
Look at all the male characters in game, are any of them highly sexualized? with the exception of roadhog, most of them are armored to the teeth. no accentuated backsides, or crotches, very no nonsense.
now look at the women characters, wi...
smh, apparently, if women in games are not objectified enough for the gamer, they will alter the game, and objectify them their selves. anyone who says this isn't objectification, where are the nude male models? if there out there. they are not listed on lewdgamer.com which adds "clean up for the next guy." thanks J4ster for this gem.
holy hell, look at Nathan drake. that perfect expression of confusion..that point when you see something that you don't understand for a second, or you're brain is trying to figure out what it is seeing, and your expression is a mashup of what you were feeling and what you are now feeling. very very good work there from what i can see!
well it's their IP, if they want to run it into the ground, or change it, they can, if that makes people mad, sorry bout it. write yur own game.
My point is, if they ruin a game, and people don't buy it, then they learn ...if people buy it and complain about it, or complain before it is even out, but then buy it anyway....they are still making money.
of course hype is driven by imagination, that may or may not include facts...what hypes someone about a game, is the possibilities of the game. facts may shave and mold those possibilities down, but we always hold it to our own individual idea of what the game should be like, even if that is not actually what the game is.
The Trick is that when we find out that the game is not like what we expected, we not let that spoil our enjoyment of said game. and appreciate it for w...
I don know where you got the 25% from ...other than pulling numbers out your butt lol, but I do agree with you, that early access does not mean necessarily that he game will ever get completed. and our money goes nowhere.
I mean what incentive does a developer have to actually finish a game, if not for the pride in the game they are making. <--which is a big motivator
I bothers me so much, because Microsoft is like a soulless art collector, they don't buy art because they enjoy looking at it, they buy it because they want to own something everyone else enjoy looking at!
I saw that as a big, "hey we got frostbite games" haha
@indyman77
Well you can't just put any game on a cellphone, because I don't care how cool your phone is, touchscreen will never be as good as a controller. I mean have you ever played mario on a touchscreen?
so the games that you would play on cellphones are stuff that doesn't require a lot of quick movements, or quick buttons. which leaves what...pokemon? that's about it lol
that may be true, but i still like 80% of the games they put out...because ...they are for the most part fun!
As a fan of the OoT, wow I am really impressed by Impa, she looks badass!
yes, because lets face it, peripherals for a console, are going to do about half the sales of the console it's self. This due to most people not wanting to spend a bunch of money for something that is not built into the system. I will tell you when VR will hold it's own...when consoles get small enough, while remaining powerful, and can be built into the VR device it'self. Till then it will always be a peripheral. AND there are people who are gamers, but just for whatever ...