Definately not for me.Quite average.
Best franchise ever???Are you for real?
Civilization for example is a much better franchise,like baldurs gate are really quite a few others.I suggest playing them again to notice just how many problems both games have,especially infinite.
Power.To have them all.
2 1080s for 750 euro wasnt a rip off for me.
@ninsigma I made the website for a big computer store in my country with wordpress and instead of a paycheck i got the second 1080 for free.
Why the disagrees???Its quite a qood and enjoyable job.Its not like i am a hacker that sits in a chair 5 days straight only writing code...
The titan was worth it though,for its double precision.
Can i have just the first one??Both sequels,especially infinite,were mediocre compared to the first one.
Not for my sli 1080s at 4k.Preety easy by the look of the game.
I can see the difference on my 4k monitor from 15 meters away.Maybe thats because i play on 4k since 2012,but i can very easily see it.
When all my pc parts have at least 3 years warranty and console parts are of much worse quality,i think extra warranty is absolutely needed.Not to mention bigger hard drive and extra controller.And i dont want a console.Too weak,too cheap,extremely limeted utility and it hasent got a single game that i would buy,that dosent already comes out on pc.Good post though.I just cant see a single point where a pc gamer buys a console.
Sorry,but the average pc is not 800$.For 800$ you get easily 3x ps4 performance.A friend 1 week ago built a 720 euro pc with cf 290s,i5 4460 and 8gb ram.Agree with most points,but one question.Does anybody on consoles pay for extra warranty???
@mochachino That is witcher with aa,gameworks on.if i tuen them off+foliage to high,+20-25 fps.Consoles simply wont do 4k because the cpu is very low clocked and its cores are weak.Tested 120 games since i got them last week and play all of them 4k/60 fps ultra.
OmnislashVer36 But 4k is extremely better than aa.Thats because at 4k,you dont really need aa at all.
Morrowind>>>oblivion& gt;>>>>skyrim.
at 1080p ultra avg fps is about 180-190(gtx 1080,5820k)
played it months ago,looks very good.
can easily do. i have sli 1080s and lowest avg fps i have seen at 4k is in witcher 3 90-95fps avg.
When Resolution became antialiasing???As someone who plays 4k 60fps since 2012,if resolution=antialiasing,why the performance drop,for example on my 1080 when going from playing doom at 1080p(190 avg fps) goes at 4k at 70 fps avg and when i use the most resource heavy aa,drops only 12-15 fps???
Much worse than this.
battlefront,even if its a terrible game,runs extremely easily on 4k and looks very good.1080 60 fps avg on ultra can be achived easily by a old 290/780. Dice knows what is doing at the technical side of things.
And went from bad to average,compared to POE,grim dawn and torchlight 2.