yippie1234y

yea but by cross game chat i mean being able to talk to my friends regardless if we are ingame, loading, waiting for someone at the dashboard ect..

i play cod4 competitively so that means i care about my bullets registering the second i shoot. I cant do that with psn in fact i would pay the 50 bucks a year for psn if i could rely on the connection more because i rather be playing on ps3 with the better controller and not worrying about getting the rrod.

and honestly i see psn catching up alot and i favor my ps3 when a game comes out on both systems. (unless its a shooter)

But i would like to see cross game chat and better connection. When it comes to shooters like cod4 i rather play on 360 because the bullets register better and i don't get caught up in lag kills. Also more people socialize with the microphones.

I know im gonna get 10000 disagrees but im a gamer telling it how it is and what needs to be improved. As...

that piece on the flip lid looks like its meant to hold toilet paper

cod4 ftw

all though if css was on ps3 i think i might have to say its king

they would not make an announcement about making an announcement to cut the price...

...they would just do it.

all sales would come to a halt until the day of the price cut.

just not a good idea $$$ wise.

does it work for black people?

i got 1 account on each system (360 and ps3).

i got both systems cause i had nothing to play when i my xbox got the red ring.

then my membership expired during the process. at this point i really gave ps3 a chance and enjoyed the free online. When gears 2 came out i was back on xbl. I guess the point im trying to make is each system has its good and bad this war over which system is better is so dumb.

what is the point do you think one day the other side...

too bad the camera is racist

radeon ftw

roflcopter

^^ or maybe you dont like woman

i cant believe i stuck up for valve making lfd2...

its obvious they dont know what they are doing

noobs lol

valve is a good company. they care what the gamers want, the delivered some of the greatest multiplayer games ever, and they offer free dlc. cut them a break and give them a chance its not like they announced lfd3 before lfd2 came out. like cod does.. luckily i know which ones to avoid.. and it rhymes with gay garch.

valve is a good company. they dont charge for dlc. with that being said, if they want to make a game thats totally up to them. they should announce they are making a sequel since lfd was game of the year. we already knew about cod mw2 when cod wow was about to be released. i understand if people are still enjoying the original.. so if thats the case wait till the price drops on the sequel and then buy it. i never even played lfd.. i play ps3.. but to make a petition to not make a game that ha...

in-game private chat please

how are ppl still complaining about the price of the ps3, it cost that much because it is expensive to make

its a blue ray player! and the built in wireless is a $100 value

whatever i already got mine a few years ago.. these ppl must own that other system.

well then clearly you will see the difference assuming that statement is true.

i own both consoles and when games are not exclusive i tend to favor one for that reason alone.

just suck that the computer version is gonna need 2 top of the line video cards and infinite ram.

i couldn't agree with you more

what i would like to know is why there has only been 1 sequel to counter-strikes in the past i dunno 10 years?!?

i mean it was possibly the biggest online shooter ever. they should take another shot at a console version but this time make it good.

rofl mr bun