so much fail. everybody knows you prefer anything thats not on the ps3. and btw dont you m,ean infamous 1?
sony has showed they dont need to sell alot to get big budgets, Team ico comes to mind
i love how he made the title. he just had to mention the ps3 instead of just saying the "other" version sold better. he just wants to start a flamewar
edit: and btw the article isnt a fanboy article its just a fact article?
just shows ads arent everything as most people want to believe
same brother! keep holding out
thanks for the spoiler retard
games are too easy these days... rewinds? shit anybody can win a race with rewinds
sometimes he just speaks a little too quick, but makes me better at english
well.. its more realism than other shooters
yeah there are loads of britains compared to the dark north, the ad prices are probably minimal compared to UK
sometimes were flooded with ps ads in scandinavia, in cinemas, tv and posters
that squaresoft logo made me cry. rip squaresoft
i think you should look at it like this: can good graphics save a bad game? not that bo is a bad game but, its a hypothetical question
god damn it. why the f*** does treyarch belong to activision. that fucking retarded robert kotick, i ***** hate supporting that guy
how the hell should the hardware division improve psn?
patches are good no doubt, but the time they spend on pacthing a 1 year old? time they could use polishing their titles in production
it should be a spinoff and called Rising
day one pc
geez i was joking
not all games jump on that DLC train. therer are still titles worth playing day one