if i were to buy a console for under $200 i would questions its quality.
just saying.
am I the only one who thinks they look kinda childish and not as mean as transformers should? i mean, it looks a lot like the original cartoon which was awesome, but i love the look of the movie transformers, as ghey as the movies are, atleast the models look badass. also, they mention teling the story of before they came to earth...why are they cars then? i am sure this is done to allow the player to recognize who they are. I guess i am just to stuck int he movies where bay showed them all w...
Natal will be fun. But not any more fun than wii and move. Also, they have to crack those gamers(like myself) who just prefer to have something in their hands. there are little things in games that you need to click something to make it happen, i am interested in how they will capture that with movement. I really hate that motion is the new "it" thing. just make games like you have been for years and keep everyone happy.
that made me laugh.
why i disagree with this "digital only future" is because the people(such as myself) are already paying for monthly internet and download/upload use. mine is 75gb a month..which sounds like a lot. but you'd be surprised how much that is used between 3 computers and 3 systems. my concern with this "future" is that i will be paying monthly for my internet use and potentially extra for going over my limit, and then i will be paying for the product i am buying which is pushing...
video is gone...and that makes me sad.
they do that, and they will loose the console war. I realize thats a bold and maybe silly statement but here is why i think so:
having one unit is what made consoles so accessible compared to PCs. everyone had the same platform and could get the same quality no matter what. only thing effecting this gen is tv quality. but the amount of people who dont have some sort of highdef tv is very slim. I dont mind the differen HDD units, but if you limit some(like the arcade with no hdd) ...
i have waited for this game for far to long..so long in fact that I no longer care about it. which is sad.
i dont understand how it gets so low for looks.
the game looks amazing...and lasting appeal..well, played the demo for an amazing amount of time, soo im not sure what they are talking about.
this game is better than MW2 in almost everyway.
i still cant get my game killzone to work online. -_-
xbox is so retarded
i understand the banning process...but when you have a game that allows to exploit it, how can you bann the player for finding these glitches and such, especially cause these xbox players are paying for their online access. idk..just my two cents. talk to your game creators, or make a system that isnt so easily hacked/modded.
jesus...here we go again.
this might be my biggest reason for disliking the Halo series...it brings out the best of the fanboys.
i got it aswell.
very awesome..i love free.
i must find out the mission in this game though...lol
Canada finally gets treated along with the US...nice.:D
$100 for the arc....why do I think this is far from being correct.
come back kid...or the kid who was always good but never picked to play because he was different.
i own Lair..and enjoy it.
this game is amazingly fun.
the demo keeps making me want to play, even though its the same damn map and same objective.
COD4 meet your new boss.
i know its not more fun to play.
story and game play may all be better...but does it give you the "wow thats insane" feeling Uncharted gave? I dont know if that will be achieved again for a while.
plus, they are two completely different style of games its like saying Halo is better than Grand theft Auto.
i havent used IE in years.
my guess as to why it says its in the top spot is because now everyone uses chrome and firefox instead of just using firefox.
well, this makes Reach look like SNES. what a stupid comparison.