CRank: 5Score: 30860

because it has earned it's success with the 3 previous gens

4241d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

*yawn* is this an article?

4242d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

jeez. how big is ur tv? used on Rayman Legends. Worked incredibly well. Even snapping youtube while I played was good

4242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

If an xbox supporter said that about the ps4....

4242d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

nice! love my WiiU but it is still my back up console.

4242d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

not everyone owns all 3. vita sales would tell u that. glad MSFT doesn't own a portable device

4242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Money and freedom. That's why it's a 10 yr deal with Activision Blizzard

4243d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

irrelevant. They want to maximize their profit and by being on last and current gen, they will make a ton of money. Idc for PC, but obviously that would be even more money!

4243d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

as ANY company should be doing! how dare they give incentives!

4243d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

damned if they do. damned if they don't.

4243d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

go see a shrink

4243d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

the size of a roku with streaming only

4243d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ugly looking console. The XB1 and PS4 arent any better either. In the end though, it's the games that count

4244d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Not I!

4244d ago 0 agree6 disagreeView comment

rank means nothing. they've just played more than u

4244d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The masses will say "haha oh man! they need to bundle games to make sales" ...smh. damned if u do, damned if u don't MSFT! ugh. anyways! let's go MSFT!

4244d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

I love XB1 but no the WiiU doesn't need saving either!

4244d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

get over urself! it doesn't need saving! smh

4244d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Score one for the bad guys!!!

4245d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Read the article

4245d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment