unny that this comes straight after the article that shows how reach barely touches killzone 2..
360 fanboy trying to justify it much? lol..
the fact is the ones shown in the killzone 2 comparison arent alhpa or pre-alpha stage.. they are way past that! they have been in development with this game since the release of halo 3! and thats a fact..
so if they were only in the alpha stage that would be insane and mean they were working at an extremely l...
im a big fan, say what you want but he tells the truth and his reviews are honest and 9/10 hes 'rumours' and 'connections' come up tops..
he mentioned on his site earlier that theres been minor talks of his own tv show, since hes started getting huge publicity, even in the playstation magazine etc
because companies can work on multiple games you fool!
you know how rockstar are working on gta dlc, la noire and agent at once?.. how ea are always working on multiple titles..
enjoy reach 360 fanboys..
then see how much better the game they make for ps3 is(if they make an exclusive game) ;)
LOL do you mind posting the said article that shows that they are 'removing stuff because the consoles cant handle it' ?
and 2048x2048 textures ? are you insane? lol.. that would mean they were making a game that only people who are rich can play on maximum? there arent even alot of gfx cards that ouput this, let alone monitors unless you wanna spend like 3k on a 26" screen alone lol
i mean about 40% of pc users are still using the 1024 resolutions lol.. abo...
panda your really over estimating your pc :P crysis devs are said to be working on coding that will unleash the ps3's x16aa techniques.. the ps3 can also output up to(but wont be used until hdmi 1.4 is released) 120fps.. and also has 7 useable cell processors.. its much more powerful than the computer you're sitting at right now i garuntee you..
dont get me wrong im not denying the fact that it will look better on super high-spec pc's.. just the fact that not EVERYONE have thes...
by reaches release it will be on par with killzone 2 if not slightly better.. but kz3 is already in the making with a new engine that tops the kz2 one.. halor:reach is about to enter a losing fight lol
the sun doesnt pierce the sky?.. well duh lol
and the lighting in killzone 2 is actually amazing.. you may want to look up the video comparison of gears 2 and kz2.. it really shows the lighting off in that
but at the same time killzone 2 is a whole year old..
and they have been developing halo reach for about the same time, i mean the artwork n shize was probably all sketched up close to KZ2's release..
so you would still expect it to kick its ass.. i mean the game has a beta which is usually released not far from the games final product..in the sense that there most likely wont be a WOW amount of graphical difference
then again i agree that it will...
you know something.. im all for uncharted 2 but seeing these screenshots reminded me of how stunning killzone 2 is..completely forgot! i may even buy it again haha
omg when i read the title i was like "noooo not another comparison where the ps3 'suffers'" then i looked and im actually shocked at how detailed and stunning KZ2 is.. i completely forgot how good it looked..
as for reach the characters and weapons have a really nice smoothness and detail but the levels dont seem that 'wow'.. they need to step it up for release because thats quite terrible that they are only just on par at a push with KZ2(worse imo, but i dont want to...
they didnt pay rockstar for its exclusivity, they were paying as they were part of the games development using there own teams but rockstar kept re-writing it and ended up basically blowing the funds supplied by sony..
agent is coming because they owe sony, i mean sony didnt even chase them up for the cash.. just basically said 'enoughs enough, youre not getting anymore for this project' so now rockstar have came to them with agent as a sort of 'we messed up, our bad' lol
well of course they do, but there 'exclusives'game development budget is covered by third party developers.. they pay for the exclusivity..
where as sony tend to fund the game development of there exclusives, uncharted 2 to name a few are great examples that this works aswell..
maybe the fact that they DO NOT PAY FOR EXCLUSIVITY ? :P its exclusive in japan because RPGS sell like hot cakes and the 360 barely has a fan base over there
your missing one point.. it was a new console which of course saw its hype, but the fact they had a year head start infront of the ps3 with the ONLY next gen console it was bound to take a huge leap and win over loads of people..
this meaning up until 2010 sony were waaay behind on console sales so of course there 360 exclusives sold better.. but now sony are catching up in consoles so the ps3 exclusive sales are obviously going to increase.. your basically talking in past tens...
its that they dont actually give a f#*k what microsoft do, if sony satisf there customers they are happy.. microsoft waste there money on timed exclusives while sony use there money launching new ip's giving more companies the chance to make games, and produce games of a better quality..
but who cares microsoft are flopping as we speak.. there losing money dramatically! there losing the internet to google and such, browser to mozilla, theyve started a losing war with zune agai...
and microsoft use the 360 AND original xbox.. you'll never justify over 17 million accounts without the fact that more people have signed up.. its that simple.. some people dont want to pay for the internet twice..
or incase that offends you "a service that is so much better" aka.. cross game chat & out of game party systems lol
@7.5 thats where your wrong.. uncharted 2 used ALL of the systems processors, and this game is slated to top uncharted 2, so please re-think what you havejust said.. also your pc graphics card not only handle the graphic output but the processes with it.. where as on the ps3 a cpu cant be set to handle all of the gpu's data processes allowing the gpu to output nothing but its pretty colours etc etc.. meaning you get alot more from it than your standard pc card.. and remember the ps3's garphic...
or maybe not everyone has a super computer and still want to play it at full spec.. seems sensible to me instead of playing it a low settings, i mean if at the time my PC is capable then of course i will but its not likely lol my pc graphics card is wank
its actually not SANDBOX, you can not roam anywhere you want at anytime you want.. GTA, saints row, oblivion, fallout <they are sandbox..
halo:reach will consist of levels.. the difference is that you may wander each level in whataver direction you wish.. that is not actually sandbox as you are still restricted