I hate the fact in BF4, you cannot shoot out all the lights, some move aka doom3:), some flash. And the real dynamic ones go out properly. In China rising maps, most foliage out of the way is worse then GT5. But it's still a stunning looking game.
For this openworld game, the lighting is awesome. Dynamic lighting takes alot of juice.
Rayman Legends, hahahahahah.
Don't get me wrong it's an ok game. Something the wii u can handle pretty well.
It isn't pushing nothing.
I wish people would stop waffling on about ESRAM. The GPU is weak sauce and is the reason graphical games are less then 1080p and stuggle with their fps, ryse i'm looking at you, it's also the reason Titanfall uses an old engine to achieve 60fps on xboxone.
Nobody has ever ...
Not saying it's not fun. Looks fast and fluid. Just watched some gameplay.
But Textures are not good.
But i understand using source engine will have compromises. That's why it was used for X1, so it would have 60fps while looking ok.
The action looks decent and fluid, the neck break looked silly. It's not that easily done. Like his neck was made of twigs.
Wow even maxed textures on PC, still looks crap.
Those high rez textures are medium on any other game.lol
Should be free, for the fukups of the bugfest of release.
But E.A are too greedy for that.
MCTJim
Just wondered what you regard as the best looking game on any platform.
Looks excellent, not photo realistic though.
the way it drives will be the most important thing.
They have probably locked it at 30fps.
It probably runs anywhere from 45+ in most area's. But to keep tearing and a smooth experience they kept at 30fps.
Uncharted 2-3, resistance 3 was quality 30fps.
Erm.
Killzone sf and BF4 have eye candy.
Deep down has plenty of candy.
Second son destroys any open world game.
PS4 Handles 1080p fine.
As for BF4(as much as i love it) is a bugfest. Not really surprised it's 1600x900 on PS4.
Trouble is, people say 1080p, like it's the same textures,lighting,shadows,aa from PS3, just upgraded to 1080p, When we all know it's a whole new ballgame.
I'm sick of idiots thinking that xboxone and PS4 are close in power. They are not and will never be.
PS4 has near enough double the power gpu w...
Insomnia_84
Starhawk transforming and flying is excellent, but i think they messed up the formula of warhawk.
Warhawk did not need adjusting.
I hope they make a warhawk for PS4.
As for titanfall, it looks decent in some area's, but it's not a game changer. MS needs to big it up though, so it's understandable.
Thing is last gen.
PS3 AND 360 both had 4.4gigapixel output, which was the reason for many games not being 720p. Racing games can always be higher. Because your not rendering as much. GT/FORZA.
WII U outputs at 4.4gigapixels also. But has more ram and updated tech. Shader model 5 but weak cpu. - 8 rops.
XBOXONE outputs 13.1 gigapixel, 16- rops.
PS4 outputs 25.6 gigapixels - 32 rops.
They are not close and will n...
I'm not really sure what people expect.
Source engine is ok and all.
But graphics engines have really moved on. It's not going to look alot better on PC, an increase in REZ,aa.
PS4 GPU is 50% stronger.
No they are not close.
You would never be able to match PS4 graphics on xboxone with same rez,textures,aa.
Impossible. It does not matter what they use the ram for.
The GPU is 50% weaker on xboxone.
But that is not to say the xboxone cannot have great looking games.
Low rez garbage.
It doesn't matter.
PS4 version will look more or less the same as PC.
xboxone will be lower rez, or less fps.
If it isn't they are not pushing PC/PS4.
As for the gameplay. Looks sweet.
I'll be picking that up.
55million for xboxone
PS4 125million.
I got a PC Code, ran the game.
It needs optimizing on PC, let alone XBOXONE.
BF4 runs better on my rig and looks better.
As for the gameplay.
It feels shallow. There is plenty of shooting, but the bots are crap. And most of the players i took out with ease. The jumping on walls, and movement reminds me of crysis.
It's not for me, but i'm glad i played it.
But BF4 is unmatched.