Rockstar cant do MP in my opinion, the gameplay is far to clunky to be any fun hence why most people end up in the driving modes like races and free roam. This Ultimately ruins most Rockstar games for me as the gameplay is pretty average at best to me.
blame cyrtek for that, sitting on a damn gold mine with Timesplitters.
They have one of the best RTS devs but I do feel they may have been better going with relic entertainment who do the more traditional style rts games and they do them the best at the moment.
to be fair it is considering how mediocre this gen has been.
some of you people make me laugh you seem to think that all SP games have loads of content compared to MP games, whats funny is alot of them don't they have a measly 12 hour campaign and 0 replay value with pointless collectibles and usually have a very tacked on MP. Where as you can get way more hours out of these so called contentless MP only games...
I just think some of you hate MP or are either terrible at MP so just hate on it for the sake of hating on it.
Um yes they did... If you had been on N4G articles for the game before release you would of seen people talking about the SP and buying it because of the game having one. In fact I heard more people talking about buying solely for the fact it had a SP.
1 reason why not to. Rockstars clunky gameplay that ruins their games.
right... Because giving everyone automatics on a WW1 game doesn't show how casual it is when very few of those automatic weapons were actually used. They do it to cater to the casual market. Health regen, which was added in to well cater to the casual market again. Able to repair vehicles while inside them, guess what? yep added in to make the game more accessible fr new/casual players. The series has progressively done this stuff.
I love the BF series but it's far...
All Witcher 3 ones are great and you get the great music with them.
He is a beast but he is in dire need of a hp buff or a movement increase or an alteration in some way as he is only good when the other players defend you well and the enemy team doesn't focus you.
but cod and BF are two sides of the same coin... People just seem to think BF is a far better game when it has very similar issues to cod, it's becoming just as casual, slowly removing the team aspect of the series. BF1 looks great and all but it's just going to be a copy and paste of 3/4 with a skin on top.
I'm looking forward to it but I'm not expecting anything amazing from DICE now a days.
I think the competitive is the best thing about the game as no longer do I have to deal with the vast amount of useless players, due to being rated over 60+ I tend to get people who are actually trying to win and usually have the majority of the team in voice comms which makes the mode miles better. This mode is made for people that want to win and want to test their skill against over similarly/higher ranked players and for this it's very good for me.
The actual system...
Uncharted 2 is the best one, i also feel that 3 and 4 are quite badly overrated, good games but they are not as good as 2 for me mainly due to them not adding anything at all gameplay wise to the series..
seems that it's complete random though as some people have received codes without even signing up which kind of sucks.
still won't save the games biggest problem. The lack of depth in gameplay.
dayum son.
why is this suddenly a problem...
no i just don't see how £30 for a 2 year old game is a deal... And stop being such a vile cretin as well.
Frostfall was my favorite along with the capes.
CoD2 and CoD4 is all that is needed as they are the best cod games, everything after cod4 was a bit meh.