Still wondering why Silent Hill was praised for switching to first person but this is getting shunned..
I've never seen Mercy get potg anyway..
Honestly who cares about the licensing? I'll live if Ryo's watch doesn't say Timex, just release them dammit.
Damn, beat me to it
Highly recommend The House of the Dead
Imo it actually looked kinda fun. I do agree with the speed though, he could run a little bit faster, other than that I don't have any problems. This just gets me more excited for the remakes
That doesn't mean it's a VR cash in. You do realize that Resident Evil has been first person before right? They aren't doing it strictly for VR
Except VR isn't required lol
I've asked before and I'll ask again. Why is RE7 getting shit talked for being FP but Silent Hills was welcomed with open arms?
Until they introduce PS1 and PS2 games, I could honestly care less about the service
Because the gamers/news outlets made it that way. The developers stated what we should expect from this game but some gamers expected this to be some revolutionary video game. I'm enjoying the game for what it is, an exploration game.
Oh yea I know lol. I shouldve included in my comment that I was joking
Well this stuff is bound to happen when crazy fans send death threats, rushing the developers.
How do you know what kind of horror the game is? You can't simply base everything off a 10min demo
I don't understand how this website keeps getting approved. It doesn't provide any useful information whatsoever
I don't think you know the definition of lazy
Can't you just let people have fun and make money in free mode? Why don't you go to deathmatch to get your 10 kd? Oh wait, that'll be too hard since they'll be on the same playing field shooting back at you.
It's just funny how no one cared about Silent Hills being in first person but people lose their minds with RE being first person
Even with Move (not required) it's not $600