looking at ps3 exclusives not multiplats ps3 looks like the stronger platform, oh and i know "sub hd" and "30fps" so what when i see gow3 and uncharted 2 or any of the best ps3 exclusives on pc running at "high hd" and "60fps" then you can talk down about ps3 and its visuals
still beats all your games looking way better
lol it never gets old
n64 ftw
uncancelled, that would kill all shooters visually a dissagree, let me guess.....a pc fan? yes
would have sucked visually if it wasnt in its pretty beach environment, get off pcs dick and no version will be gimped the pc version should look better since crytek has been developing for pc longer than any platform especially ps3
its just stupid
and exclusives like the ones you named when i see a pc game that looks like the ones you named in higher resolution and higer fps then i will agree pc is so superior , but oh wait pc doesnt have these exclusives also saying what ps3 "cant" do thats funny more like what developers dont do, i dont care about the "6 year old gpu" funny thing is that gpu is didnt even have to go in ps3, and ps3 is a supercomputer unless your weakling pcs can do supercomputing better than ps3, ...
then whats halos excuse for not selling more than modern warfare 2? nintendo games should sell more than modern warfare 2 or anything call of duty period since nintendos been out for over 20 years and their games, it would be a shame for it not to also since wii costs several times less than a ps3 or 360 i assume it would sell that much the demographics for wii is rediculous, plus the anti call of duty clan cut down a ton of the sales call of duty would have had, and honestly do you play nint...
wouldnt sell as much as mw2s dlc even if it was one dollar, heck mw2 would sell more if your favorite games had free dlc lol
that you place over it and the numbers prove it
so people can see while photorealism is the only area that pc can do even decent graphics, naw son cg in realtime is only ps3 no pc does that other than your cg renderfarm cards
cause unless its a game that aims for photorealism then its not going to look as good, better? lol not a chance its a fact that the only pc games that look good are those that aim for photorealism
or any other ps3 exclusive except maybe GT5, since ps3 games aim for a more cg graphics type meaning the games are made from artwork, crysis is supposed to have better textures since they are using real world aspects for the game art
thats the demographic, theres no need for this article
better than all and all that no game on pc looks as cgish as ps3 exclusives anyway and killzone 3 is gonna push that further, crysis will "look" better only if you think photorealism beats cg, but this game is second to nothing in visuals
gow 3 uncharted 2 and heavy rain and killzone 2 killzone 3 and wardevil in realtime theres no game ps3 cant run
get it idiot
and 1gb of ram a developer thats going to just try to make visuals based on ram alone yes ps3 couldnt run it other than that it is future proof, 4ghz processor ps3s processor can reach speeds far greater than that when the machine is working it is future proof
i havent even seen uncharted 1 and killzone 2 and metal gear 4 on pc this gen so behind what