7? lol
more dissagrees than agrees? proof this is a pc fan site
"consoles are limited in power" not ps3 in the words of many developers so from an exclusive game standpoint i do expect that, and from a game that crytek claimed that would be the best looking game on ps3 and that would "max" out ps3 i expect "nice bright graphics and no dirt or dust anywhere and more" as ive seen much better on ps3 exclusively atleast
i wont buy any computer games cause the screens are too small and killzone 3 isnt gonna look good as uncharted 3
typical pc fan statement
this will be the best looking multiplatform game of this generation
why wouldnt i get dissagrees and you get agrees? typical battlefield fan denial what is ever new in battlefield games exactly? graphics? lol
hacksaw, outdated? lol you must mean battlefield since it came out first and its still the same game other than graphics and engine tech
what exactly was new in battlefield that is new? what is the rehash in cod? why is battlefield so boring? why cant better graphics even make battlefield sell better than cod games? you love making "consoles" an excuse for everything the reality is is that cod is the better franchise all platforms are being held back when a game is multiplatform
i know that the new counter for cod games being the best game is "sales dont equal quality" but really why does cod sell more than these would be better games than it? and why by several millions on each platform separate and combined?
snowball effect? well why doesnt battlefield snow ball effect especially since battlefield games came out first why wont it snowball why wont more people play it?
i dont get it
is this really news? sounds more like a question this person shouldve asked crytek and ea games
why not make a separate version for each platform
10 times more powerful than ps3? must be a tesla supercomputer or something
do you mean better from your vision point of view talking for everyone or just better period? ill answer for you, its your point of view vision judgement
99% of all pc gamers overexaggerate how good pc games look anyway let alone better than top ps3 exclusive games
looks better than any console game on nes and snes pc version
fixed
to say whats not possible on ps4 is dumb especially when alot more is still possible on ps3 being as sony has no ps4 plans yet sony knows ps3 still has alot more life left, dx11 is microsoft anyway ps4 wont have it, oh well big whoop, tesselation? lol by the time ps3 is done i wont really care of it
not a maybe, but ofcourse a certain group of nerds would dissagree
crysis looks better than everything guys even the cg from battle los angeles doesnt look as good as it, thats the pc gamer logic and fanboyism of their favorite platform
512 gigs of ram? lol 5 years almost and you stupid idiot pc fans still dont get thats not close to being a limitation when rsx is coupled with the cell, sonys ps3 design planned for no less than about 7 years fail safed the design of the ps3 its not a limitation friend as seen everytime ps3 exclusive games are made to a developer developing solely in the mindset to base visuals off of "i have to use ram to get good visuals" well ps3 is limited, but to naugty dog guerilla games insom...