cheating in multiplayer became available before cheating in single player....
its attention seeking...and it obv worked...
its easy, all you need to do is write an insane comment, like
Quantum Theory >>>> Gears of War
MW2 >>>>>>>&a mp;g t;>>> Battlefield 2
Final Fantazy X-2 >>>>>>>&a mp;g t;>>> Final Fantasy 7
etc...trolling for attention, because in real life you've got none
Microsoft already tried to get into the TV business...and failed miserably =S of they try again it will be a big risk...
are they also PS games?! =O if this is real, its a HUUUGE leak!
is because the game is broken enough to allow that...
a good game always counters hackers, be it through moderation, or a solid engine.
this game doesn't have that
lazy f*cking devs...
MW2 isn't "the best thats why people stills plays its"
peoples stills plays its because its easy, broken and they don't know any better.
if your comment were true, then the Wii and Lady Gaga are the best because more people buy into it
crowd mentality =/= direct measurement of quality.
if you think so, you're a ******* **** *******
awesome though =D great to see the evolution of the design!
"Single player is the weak part of the game"
sad when you consider what made COD2 and COD4 great was the AWESOME single player and equally AWESOME multiplayer
these "multiplayer only" sacrifices of a solid single player are depressing...
and don't want to share.
so basically, reason PS3 gamers cant enjoy ME1 is because MS want to hold onto it (for no good reason really, its not like people will buy a 360 just for ME1)
so yea, bizarre but its the way it is
don't hope for that
remember, thats what kind of killed the dreamcast =|
but where are the reviews?! and the release date?!?!
*facepalm*
i felt sad watching this...
If BO is good, it should have been COD4 (great game) > COD:BO (hopefully great)
MW2 was a cash in...and a big one
considering all MGS's (not spin offs) are significant and important for the story
if anything MGS2 is the LEAST important, and still quite relevant in the whole story.
so...ignorant comment =|
just because Kinect has a 3D depth sensort and IR camera, it doesn't make it ABSOLUTELY DIFFERENT to the PS Eye.
it just makes it an improved version, but the BASIC CONCEPT:
IS-THE-SAME:
track people using visual input and translate that into a GUI.
no buts, no if's. It is what it is: using a analogue visual input device (camera) as a controler.
PS Eye is one, Kinect is one. difference is, Kinect is f...
im kind of tired of seeing these "game changer" comments
they're only done by people who never tried PSEye.
I've tried both
Kinect is a super quality PSEye...but its no game changer
just like Move is a super quality Wii Mote...but no game changer.
bah...wtv, its just to get hits / adulate novelty...
I played the oil rig level (start, jetpack and wasp) and it IS killzone with better response time
MP i don't know, but I'm sure so as long as its fun, and it retains the KZ feel, its fine
P.S. i always felt that KZ2 MP enemies were unrealistic bullet sponges, I prefer a bit less health tbh, especially since levels are bigger
bigger levels = less health, makes sense or else it'd take forever to get kills
its the craziest FPS i've ever played gameplay wise
Imagine KZ2, but with SUPER SMOOTH and RESPONSIVE controls. I had to get used to it, it was too nice =P
and then add the jet pack?
I tell you this, JET pack VS JET PACK = the most unique FPS experience since Portal, it was so new and different it took a while to sink in, but wow is it amazing.
Over all, the controls are 100% perfect IMHO, you run faster, smoother, no dea...
yeeep....