I mean, the idea was there, but the concept wasn't solid.
i'm sure with a reevaluation they could make it work!
will have personal trainer special edition
you know, to show you how to play and stuff...*grin*
xD jus joking, this is smart though, makes me realize they should make one for eyepet too actually
COME ON SONY
but a glove would be enough
PSleve for example, lit finger tips, ala Minority report
cheap too, more to use WITH a controller as opposed to substituting it
@milohigh - just read your comment completely now -_- still, exactly that.
however i believe he means the way devs develop for motion controls needs to evolve
wait until we see something before judging
people are going apesh*t over a word. =/
developers have been able to take the best out of PS3, including Platinum games (this time around) so any excuse that its too hard to develop for, or problematic, or too complex, its the developers fault.
remember, a bad carpenter always blames his tools, and a bad artist always blames his paints.
what scares me is that, they are already doing damage control, yet no game has been shown =|
its more what everyone has said, its marketing / business partnership
actually, Fifa tens to sell more on PS console.
other wise, that argument would translate that COD sells more on PS3, so lets get more 360 versions sold this year by advertising for that solely.
Ico is one of the best game designs ever IMO.
I love it, I do prefer SoTC though because they took the simplicity one level forward.
Team ICO , my over all fav developer =)
@ the Leprachaun - thats a very cynical reply =/ he just stated it as fact, I can see it could be considered flame bait or trolling if he had written it in a more obnoxious manner, but to be honest, he didn't =/
for me the greatest PS game of all time is either SoTC or MGS
but thats me, then again, I don't disagree that U2 is ONE OF the greatest of all time. For sure, and easily greatest this generation along with Oblivion, MGS4 and LBP (IMO)
let people troll, it doesn't change the fact that U2 is a great game, and it doesn't change the fact that people will enjoy it
actually, quite the opposite: the more trolling the game suffers, the bigger sign it is that people resent not being able to play it.
either that, or they just know people will get riled up and do it for attention
thats what the Ignore button is there for =)
P.S Dragunov FTW! one of my fav te...
so your logic probably only applies to you - in your opinion =)
I'd say it has more replay ability than most SP centric games since its such a good SP experience.
I thought the SP would be the best out of the 3 "realistic shooters", but it is "above average", as was MW2's, BF:BC2 being absolute average
its a shame really. Too bad, still good to see MoH can stand on its own two legs, it was always a good franchise
well, I'm still waiting for my VERY GOOD SP modern military game, so far it only is Operation Flashpoint and COD4
playing ME on PC atm and enjoying it, I will know the characters and know my choices, regardless of how they do it.
+ bioware hardly disappoint, although I didn't really enjoy DA:O (personal taste, it felt like a poor mans baldur's gate) I trust bioware wholeheartedly.
@ skeptics - remember, these are THE DEVELOPERS OF THE FRANCHISE, if you haven't doubted them until now, no reason to do so all of the sudden
this was EA trying not to step on anyone's toes.
I have to say though, its a same. they should be allowed to call them what ever they want.
then again, its just the name, its not a big deal
+ everyone KNOWS its the taliban (if they play the game, and see the enemy models (which are talibans) then when playing multiplayer they will make the association
its just not CALLED that, not a big deal
I'd hope for an evolution to the series.
maybe a new setting? cross mythos?
it'd be refreshing to have Kratos invade a new mythology or something. maybe the modern(ish) world?!
so many possibilities, I just don't see GOW dying, its too big a franchise, and Kratos is too Iconic a character.
I think they just spoke of Naughty Dog's Mocap techniques and how their process was different / how they preferred it.
that said, I understand NT have been rather sour and petty about Sony due to HS having not been a block buster, and thats fair to say =)
as they please. That said, I'd say
IGN - too big for their own good, but usually solid
Destructoid - rather unprofessional in my opinion
gamespot - after the Kane and lynche debacle, I wouldn't take them as seriously, but also usually solid
EDGE - its been proven they aren't very reliable / consistent with their reviews
Kotaku - fall under the same page as destructoid, and since they posted that &...
he's too unprofessional / childish in his manner, so anything he reviews (be it fair or not) can't be taken seriously by me
thats just me though,
that said, I don't think enslaved is a BAD game at all, it looks great.
although on PC, I don't doubt the PS3/360 versions will be amazing too
all gamers will have a great time with this title. definitely one I'm looking forward to. anyone know if its as open worlded as the first crysis? doesn't seem so =/
mouse clicks / keyboard clicks= no 360 game pad
+ PC games can be played with 360 game controllers.
using that logic to assume this is 360 footage isn't very thorough
especially the part that we have the most amazing things, but the most spoilt generation thus no one appreciates anything
its stupid.