It wont allow you to do anything since you don't have a X360.
So that's why you bought Uncharted 2? Ok
You hear that Fishy? Or are you just too stuborn to admit you were wrong. There is no way Microsft will pay for a game to release in it's platform and now release that same game in every region, it's just common sense.
Do people really truly think Wii owners are going to buy a $300 console and then spend another $100 so that they can play the exact same games that came out on their current system 3+ years ago? Really? I genuinely can't tell if people are reciting bullet points or actually believe it will happen.
hmm self-contradicting much?
BTW, Iwata must be laughing his ass off right now.
spot on.
I think people disagreed with you because your comment lacked "capacity" or, maybe because obvious trolling is obvious.
Why would any publisher (that isn't Sony or Nintendo related) want to piss off Microsoft? This game (like almost every other game) is going to sell better on Microsoft's platform anyway, so pissing them off would be pretty dumb buisiness wise.
I don't get it... that's the norm on X360 so it's expected. Oblivion and GTA also shipped on one disc didn't they?
This means standard HDD for their next console + mandatory/optional install for games.
Although I disagree with Fishy, he's very reasonable and having a discussion with him is really entertaining. You on the other hand, not so much. Your comment from start to finish reeks of fanboy propaganda.
Don't bother responding to mine next time and I won't bother with yours either.
Did Famitsu say how much M$ paid? No, they're just guessing, like you mate.
By your logic, M$ paid for FFXIV, Sony paid for tales of Versperia and couldn't fork out enough money to release it in the west, the also paid for Eternal Sonata...
EDIT :
If they really had an exclusivity deal with Sony, then they would have had their asses sued for breaching the contract. They had no such deal, the only reason FFXIII was announced on the PS3 first was because of Playstaion'...
You shouldn't take everything the internet says as the word of God. It doesn't make sense. Why would you pay for a game to be released on your platform and then not release it in every region?
Many games that don't even have a tenth of FF's popularity have been released in Japan before, so why not this one? It was either Square's call, or Sony is the one who paid for exclusivity in Japan.
Actually the best selling JRPG is FFXIII and second is Lost Odyssey.
@above
Grow up kids, it's just PR crazy talk as usual.
Why would Micrososft do that and not release the game in Japan?
The cost of making games has risen with the new gen of consoles and Square-Enix wanted to sell more copies so they made the game multiplatform.
EDIT:
Why would it be a Sony exclusive is Sony isn't publishing the game or funding developement?
"owned... "
I don't get it, who is it that got owned?
You're absolutely right and to all the haters out there, what is Natal and Arc (4 years later) if Nintendo isn't ahead of the game?
Can you guys remember, not so long ago everyone hated motions controlls... till Sony and Micrososft announced them.
Ok Snaz, obviosly it's pretty much impossible to have a reasonable discussion with you seeing as you keep posting the same crap over and over.
I have the right to not like the same game as you (shocking hein)...
And the reason I don't post on PS3 threads quite often is because of people like you forcing their opinions into others.
Forza 3 has outsold Killzone 2 which came out earlier and is now at 3 mil, so by your logic Killzone 2 "did bad"? You know that's not true, don't be a hater.
Fable 2 was RPG of the year. And people will buy 3 because it'll be a good game... why do I even bother.