Clever article. Thanks!
It's a decent enough of an article idea, but as usual, the execution is so half-assed. Pretty common fare for a site like Run DLC. Hard to imagine I thought they were actually decent at one point. They're a big joke now.
"Most Infamous" is pretty damn misleading considering all the games you listed are fairly recent. Zero research went into this article clearly. Big surprise.
So...in other words, anyone who WASN'T drinking Kojima's Kool Aid realizes what a wreck MGS4's storyline was?
That's really what it boils down to. If you think MGS4's storyline wasn't complete crap, you're also one of those hardcore fanboys who think Kojima can't do any wrong, even though MGS' storyline has been absurdly bad ever since MGS2.
You can call him a genius or a visionary or whatever, but the bottom line is that ...
Thank God --someone who doesn't have their nose so far up Kojima's ass that they can realize MGS4's storyline is a complete trainwreck.
The cutscenes were monotonous and almost all completely pointless. News flash, Kojima, I don't need a 30 minute sermon about how the nanomachines in my body allow met o use weapons.
The only good story was in MGS and MGS3. MGS2 and MGS4 had embarrassingly bad stories.
I don't know if I wo...
Another pointless piece from Now Gamer. Seriously --all he does is post a quote and then whines about how much he hates forums. No one cares.
What terrible writing. I won't argue with the points he makes, but honest to God, I've seen fifth graders who can write better than the author.
Hm...
1.) No professional journalistic outlet has a review for this game out yet.
2.) Which means it's either embargoed or hardly any review copies were given to the media.
3.) Buuuuuuuuuuuuut a torrent for the pirated copy went live yesterday.
4.) SG got busted posting an early review for Halo: Reach well before the embargo expired. They claimed it was a legitimately purchased copy and yet refused to produce a receipt.
Mr. Holmes...
I'm not sold on Medal of Honor. It looks pretty generic to me. Worse than Call of Duty, which is really saying something truth be told.
Gametrailers gave it a 9.0
Seems like Gamespot is butthurt about something.
Ironstar...
Wow...
I don't even have words to express how much I hate your web site.
You guys are complete rubbish.
...says a writer from Strength Gamer.
Honestly, you shills are so easy to spot. It certainly doesn't help that ALL your comments are on Strength Gamer articles.
Oh, and terrible review. It's obvious you didn't play the multiplayer --otherwise you would know your very cursory, generic analysis of it is completely false. This leads me to believe you're once again reviewing pirated copies.
Keep up the good work, guys.
There are typos and the writing is absolute garbage. It's amateur, bush league writing.
Rife with typos, grammar issues, etc. etc. etc.
Decent review, but very, very poorly written. You guys need to hire a copy editor or something because sheesh, the author's writing reads like it was written by a ten year old.
Hey Sonic, stop shilling for Now Gamer. We know you write for them.
Now Gamer writes awful articles. Everyone knows that.
All articles from Now Gamer need to be banned.
None of these accessories are real, making this essentially one article where the author tries his best to be funny using imaginary items and fails miserably.
Wow, so you guys report on web site glitches now?
Keep up the good work, Run DLC. First a story about small tits and now web site mistakes. Quality work, folks.
MoH is being used to compete with Black Ops. Vietnam is just an expansion to please Battlefield fans. EA has finite finances --they can't make TWO MoH killers. Poorly written and poorly thought out article IMO.
Actually, if you don't like it, you shop somewhere else. That's really how capitalism works.
There's nothing wrong with shopping at Gamestop. It's just hardly the most ideal option when there's a hundred better ones available.
Examiner has like a hundred different writers that produce articles independently of one another. As a result, you shouldn't demonize the site as a whole whenever someone writes a crap article.
That said, the author, Alexander Hinkley, is rather notorious for being absolutely awful. He's easily one of the worst writers on that site.