"If you make a sim on the computer, you FIRST thought is "i have to take out......(crickets)"
You sad console fanboy, he clearly mentioned a couple of PC racing sims and yet you say there's no one to compete with on the PC. Are you sure you never skimmed through the article just to grab a quote that you think supports your ridiculous post? Because I think you did.
He could could have listed about 20+ sim racers on the PC if he wanted to.
If this is true then someone's going to die.
Every COD 1,2,3 & 4 were awesome and then everything after that went downhill. The fact that so many people on this site hate it YET still buy it really baffles me.
Most of you are just a bunch of hypocrites, you hate what the gaming industry has become yet you support these stupid same old rehash titles every year.
I wish they would ban this crap game everywhere.
The lighting looks way better than Forza 3's lighting but the cars still have this flippin plastic look to them. Is Turn 10's engine messed up or what? can't they get rid of that look?
They need to fix that seriously because it stands out a lot.
I personally don't see any problems with the 360 having PC like architecture, what is exactly wrong with that? Sony went with the stupid route of purposely making the PS3 hard to develop for.
Basically Sony created a false challenge for the devs for absolutely no reason.
In that much time they could show in-game trailers of about 50 exclusive titles.
I would rather have Freddy Krueger in my nightmares then that thing.
Then the PS4 came out.
Looks really good.
So it's basically Burnout?
Why exactly do you PS3 fanboys think it'll look better on the PS3? If you idiots even read the article you'd know why it wouldn't look good on the PS3, and don't even bother bringing up KZ3 or GOW3 because those games look blurry as hell.
If any of you PS3 fanboys ever took the time to actually LOOK at your games you'd see how bad they look. The only PS3 games that have blown me away so far are UC2, R&C:TOD & iF2. UC3's in-game graphics look li...
Paradise is and will always be the easiest Burnout game in the series. I mastered the city in like 2 hours and it's no way near as challenging as Takedown and Revenge.
From what I've read so far about this new title I flippin HATE IT! Criterion we asked for the old Crash time back in the original Burnout racing format.
NOT AN ENTIRE CRASH GAME IN ITSELF!
wow the graphics still look like AC1 which looked really bad when it came out. Have Ubisoft ever decided to update their flippin engine?
I swear the first time I saw gameplay of AC1 I thought it was a PS2 game, but now in it's 4th installment it still looks the same?
No buy for me.
GT5 has better physics than Forza 3 but everything else is just sub-par, GT4 imo was a better game because I actually enjoyed it and the game wasn't an inconsistent mess. Personally I don't like both but I would prefer Forza 3 because it's consistent.
PD wasted time and resources and their final product proves it, all of these delays points me to believe that PD had absolutely no idea what they were doing and that they were unsure about the quality of their game. ...
New in what way? it seems to have about 5 seconds of new footage in it.
Sony's most elite Loyalists (Faction G.A.Y) have been sent out and are on their way.
Surrender your opinions NOW!
There's only one explanation for how this got approved...
This site is overrun with Sony loyalists.
Facebook isn't about socialising, it's about stealing your personal information.
I wonder if their new game will be washed out with lifeless pale looking characters, choppy animations and have blurry PS2 textures like Heavy Rain.