here's the thing, i'm a fan of well done replays so damage is not important to me because when i watch the replays i want to enjoy the beauty of the cars, i dont want to see it all banged up. damage is meaningless to me. ok now honestly im probably the most unbiased poster here. why do i say this. because even though i own an xbox360 and am rooting for microsoft i will say that the graphics in those screenshots dont look all that impressive for what is supposed to be a "next gen" sy...
im a 360 guy but are you serious about the game being only 10 hours? because if it is , i dont care how good it looks i wont get it . im tired paying 50 or 60 bucks for a few hours of gameplay.
all developers should learn a lesson from bethesda softworks the makers of oblivion. not saying that it should be hundreds of hours like oblivion but at least 30 hours.
i think its the right decision by MS because even though that will help wii sales it will help MS in the end because it doesnt matter how much the wii sells, it will never get the developer support of the 360 just because the wii is not really next gen. The reason why this is a good move is because whatever will help nintendo will hurt sony MS's only real competition.
never post videos as annoying as those again. jeez, that stupid little kid cant play. the whole time i was yelling at the screen. but no seriously the game is not looking as good as the demo they showed yesterday, they better do something to improve it
http://www.xboxyde.com/stre...
ill be the first to say it. i dont doubt that GT will actually look like this but to me the car doesnt look as good as the backgrounds but i am totally convinced that the 360 can handle backgrounds like that because they are just painted there , its not polygonal. Forza doesnt have cliffs because microsoft chose to do real world tracks. Oh and did any of you notice when the ferrari turned the corner how it glided like if it was on ice? Graphics isnt everything.
click on the link i posted and watch the video the first game is Forza and it looks very very nice to say the least.
and after seeing it, GT looks like a sunday drive to grandma's house, Forza will rule!
check this out the first game is Forza
http://www.xboxyde.com/stre...
framerate or not the graphics are awesome
when the game comes out you will see what i mean about the graphics, it will run better but the 360 graphics are more colorfull. also im not argueing that the ps3 version will have more content, ofcourse it better have more content if not it wont sell because you can get it cheaper on the 360.
and honestly the 360 screenshots were more colorfull and by the way i dont have to get over anything cause if you notice my original comment i am telling the sony people to enjoy the game.
http://media.xbox360.ign.co...
http://media.xbox360.ign.co...
i loved tokyo extreme2 on dreamcast but when the series went to playstation2 the graphics turned me off, but now that its on the 360 i will pick it up
with you, GT looks more "photo-realistic" but i would say that overall Forza is the better game.
if this announcement was that they changed the story for this one and decided to extend the frachise indefinately. in other words:
halo4, halo5, halo6.......
this game's graphics are so cheesy. definately not next gen.
so you like to watch the truman show huh? you are clearly retarded ,we are talking about three games here and they are all racing games so why are you mentioning all these other games. it funny that what you are accusing me of is exactly what you are. talk about a flip mode. I call it the way i see it because thats the way it should be so if GT looks better than PGR3 i will say it.
TheAnomalySOS and i have only played 3 games oblivion, GTR3 (which i didnt like), and ridge racer which i hated