Play in a 64 player game then say that. Of course if you have a console, then you're out of luck.
Does this even say anything about the multiplayer?
It's getting ragged because the graphics look the same as the past 2-3 games, they don't really change the multiplayer too much, and the amount of hackers is ridiculous (at least when I played MW2 on 360)
Has been since MW1 IMO
Dang that must suck.
NWhy don't they just do normal mode/action mode?
Game sucked. Played the demo and was glad that was that.
The only thing these games have in common is cover and they're both third person. Seriously, this is just asking for an argument. Both games are excellent for their respective consoles. OH NO 10 PERFECT SCORES IS MUCH LESS THAN 15 PERFECT SCORES. The devs enjoy each other games, so why can't you whining fanboys?
Oh really? You've played it?
Cause the bullets kill you. Knife < Gun.
Eh, campaign felt very rushed. Had it's moments overall, but not very well done.
And Master Chief and Cortana. And guns.
Why would you pirate a mainly multiplayer game. I don't understand.
Anyone know when new AMD drivers will be out?
It's not that, it's the fact they literally change nothing in the game and sell it off as brand new. That is what's stupid. If you put a video of MW3 and MW2 side-by-side and asked a person which game is newer, they probably won't be able to tell.
I have that too. Run it on high no problems. Never lower than 30 FPS.
They easily could have charged for it though.
I'd rather them fix bugs that they might have missed early on and balance weapons then roll DLC out like a month after release.
Yes because maybe EA didn't make it like this? And surely Battlefield 3 is the only game that has review embargo up to one day before release.
Dude just had a bad experience. For us who don't have bad experiences, it's great.