lol more reasonable than February for sure.
I can't wait to play this game!
I can't authenticate my copy for online play, this is weak. Really weak.
the money they make from the sale of the original game goes into funding the NEXT game. Paying for DLC is, as you say, to pay the people who made it.
the only real issue I took with that articel is the idea that having an ironsights option in a first person game is somehow the beginning of the end. Fallout 3 without ironsights is whack. I want to be able to look down my sights when I'm playing an FPS, it makes complete sense.
Saints Row 3...
While I agree it won't happen, I agree because EA has said it isn't happening right now.
DICE is also working on battlefield Play-for-Free and is often updating Battlefield Heroes. It's completely possible for a developer to work on more than 1 title. It's just not the case here.
it's not of death unless it bricks the console.
However, this person clearly named the article that way to garner more interest, which is fine.
April Fool's jokes don't work after 12pm on April 1st, so I doubt they count if you start them a week early...
Also, the idea that they put the International release first as some sort of clue is nonsense. As I said before, it's likely because once it's all done and discs are made, they probably miss the shipping date for the tuesday before, but why make International gamers wait just because America releases on Tuesdays?
the idea that a game being made in Texas couldn't possibly be released elsewhere first is naive at best.
it's likely to do with release windows and all that crap we don't know about. games are released Friday almost everywhere except the US that releases stuff on Tuesdays. So they could get in done in time for the friday release but miss the tuesday? maybe? something like that.
my biggest issue with this article is that the day 1 patch is classed as a disappointment instead of nothing.
Also, the lack of dx11 wouldnt be a surprise if you looked around the internet like 2-3 weeks ago.
No
Nobody told Treyarch that you cannot brag to a community that has a problem with you and expect to win favour?
it's made by the people who made Frontlines, so that's why it seems similar.
Ok, I read the actual statement. They do say they are looking into it.
How the HELL did you not quote the part of the statement that validates your headline? Are you insane?
Where in this article does Microsoft's statement suggest more penalising than simply invalidating the codes?!
Could you perhaps link to the statement you are claiming makes this declaration?
can I at least get some props for that busted ass "photoshop" I made for this? lol
it is news. you should perhaps look up the word before you make such bold statements.
Now, is it news that interests you? no. Although, you did take the time to click and make a comment about it, even tho all info is in the headline.
I have considered downloading this game as I was gonna trade in my remaining games (as I am poor and only have a few) so i can afford to buy it coz it looks awesome, but I don't wanna clear my collection only to end up with a crappy game, so if they release a demo, I wouldn't even consider a download.
Good, serves them right, idiots.