gameseyeview

TheRealLando

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 4750

I'd just like to point out, that the guy who reported the article for 'bad editing' clearly didn't actually read the article. He states to not end the description with '...' but had he read the article, he'd have seen it's a verbatim from the piece that leads into the actual recorded audio, not some sort of witchcraft and trickery. Perhaps if he didn't have a dozen articles reported, and NONE approved within only the last hour, his opinion would matter more...

5039d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I wrote the review myself - I'll explain that statement. I honestly feel as though the CoD community makes the game worse. However, it's not really fair to rate the game based on the community. I felt I did a fairly thorough job of explaining the problems with the community itself throughout the review and how it could negatively impact the game. The game, left to it's own merits, in my opinion is very good. It may not be for everyone but it's still a high quality game.

5199d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I couldn't disagree with you more Brutallyhonest.

A review of something objective is an always will be an opinion. Not everything has to have a caveat, or a statement such as 'I didn't like the linear story as much as previous entries in the series, but those who enjoy that type of thing will love it!' because those types of things are understood. A review is the writers personal opinion and always will be, in every medium. It's the reason I love stuffed c...

5206d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView comment

So in your mind good is always good, no matter what? Like anything else in life, taste and preference are all subjective. To suggest that one person's opinion is purely based on generating hits and that this piece is agenda driven is pure BS.

What kind of world would we be in where everyone liked the same thing all of the time? Based on what you say here, that's the kind of world you'd like, where no one can have differing opinions and good is always good and bad...

5206d ago 1 agree6 disagreeView comment

I think much of the difference comes from the types of games they are. Just my two cents. One is a 200+ hour epic. The other a 10 hour action adventure where controls mean everything.

5206d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

Holy Christ - to the people claiming the site is trash because the game got a 7/10, get a clue. Differing viewpoints are fine and encouraged but to act like there is an agenda here, for a site WITHOUT ads is ludicrous.

A 7/10 isn't exactly a bad score but take a step back and reflect for a moment - This game isn't as good as about 4 other games that are out this holiday season, and not nearly as good as UC2. If you don't agree that's okay but don't rip th...

5206d ago 1 agree15 disagreeView comment

Nice job guys. Keeps getting better!

5351d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well said!!

5383d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Good review, thoroughly enjoyed it. I agree that you can't really punish a game for not improving on what didn't need to be improved on, like other publications have.

5457d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nice job. Can't wait to play it.

5459d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Nicely done. Another fine job.

5460d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Im really looking forward to Bulletstorm as well.

5542d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Very nicely done guys. There are a few honorable mentions but these are clearly the top echelon games of 2011.

5542d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nice review!

5577d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

At this point, I'd simply settle for something that lasts longer than 20 hours, max.

5583d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

great news! can't wait!

5583d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Looking forward to this game, big time.

5596d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Good job. Very fair review.

5598d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

you're trolling in the wrong review. This is for WWE Smackdown Vs Raw.

5599d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

harder than in the past?

5599d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment