Yeah, they probably will do a GOTY since there is a season pass that will have 7 skins, tombs etc... which we can safely say they will release it each one every month
The fact that the trailer came out after the KH3 trailer, I was just dead the entire day lol
lol
Ghost of Tsushima looked beautiful!
Yeah, I was actually intrigued by QB when they first revealed it, but as you said, they might have had to comply with what Microsoft wanted.
Yes! I mean I was excited about the other games too, but like I said in the article, those games were expected to appear anyways.
I have not gotten to play Nioh yet, but if I had, probably the announcement would have me pretty stocked too.
I'm not the only one who plays Xbox and even though I'm getting a bit tired of Halo and Gears (not to the point to being fed up yet though), there are still a lot of people who play and enjoy those franchises.
Yes, I would prefer MS just announce new IPs but they need to just announce games period at E3.
You may be right that game pass may not be consumer friendly in the long run. It really depends on the content inside it. If we keep getting duds like Sea of Thieves then it'll definitely fail but if they can put out some new, quality IPs for game pass along with Halo 6, Gears 5, etc. they should be fine
Disagree about MS pushing a fake narrative that downplays single player though. In my opinion, MS is attempting to be more multiplayer heavy due to Sony and Nintendo...
I was just curious on your thoughts man. No worries. Yeah, I think that it is possible but if they start talking about "Native 4K", new consoles, or the Kinect 3.0 then they have no shot to walk out of E3 looking good.
Sony is stacked without any surprises in their conference (and there will be a few for sure). Ubisoft has Beyond Good & Evil 2 and AC: Odyssey. Nintendo has Smash Bros. which will always be a win. EA has Battlefield V and Anthem. We have no idea...
If the service included better first party IP's would it be worth it in your opinion? Just curious. I have Game Pass and personally, think it's been worth the price so far
100% can't agree more with you on 4K, timed exclusives, and backwards compatibility. They've been using that as a featured aspect of their conference for years. They have to walk in there Sunday with AAA quality games
Scalebound is mainly used here as an example for new IPs for the company. I, like many Xbox players, love Gears and Halo but there is only so many times I can spend $60 on those franchises.
Totally disagree with you on the "Not Wanting to try to make a BR game is the same lack of risk taking MS is known for". Even though the genre is thriving now, the whole thing can implode at any second due to copycat games, law-suits, lack of "innovation" in the genre...
"Backwards Compatibility" is up there too
Like I said in the piece, Sony is stacked for sure (Hopefully we get a gameplay trailer at E3 for Death Stranding). I just thought Microsoft is the wild card and has a chance to shock some people
Per Dailymail.co.uk and all the other news articles it states...
Peter Parker and his alter ego Spider-Man must be white, straight and male according to a legal licensing agreement between Sony Pictures Entertainment and Marvel Entertainment.
The information was revealed in a massive document release by WikiLeaks, a whistleblower website that released 276,394 files, emails and financial data on to its servers this week.
In the contract that went into effect ...
uff, I immediately pre-ordered the ultimate edition since I regretted not getting the Rise of The Tomb Raider one. Especially since the RoTTR collectors was only for the Xbox One and I did not own an Xbox One.