Yeah, it's much better to look at guys posing.
Some games after a year a $60. Look at Black Ops and MW2 is still $40. WTF
Developers, not publishers.
Come on, watch it! watch it! watch it!
I'm confused about one thing. The PS3 version is almost 3 points higher. Because those 3 points could be pretty significant. Usually multiplat games differ in a range of about 1-2 but not more unless there's difference in the games..
Now just imagine Uncharted 3...
You have to pay for Visa... :(
She has no use for any PS3 features and has no issue with the lack of Xbox features. She has 2 Xboxes but can't afford to buy a PS3, she has a Blu-ray player but can't afford to buy one, she "likes" to pay for XBL and still claims to not be a Xbox fangirl. SMH
How many times did the guy say "be advised..."? This is annoying I hope they fix it.
haha, even 6 years later GT5>Forza10
But that's only if you have PS Plus -_-
My guess is sports fans...
No doubt it's like when poor people finally get some food, even if it's shitty (CoD), they will appreciate it because they don't get it everyday, and once in a year they get to eat a lobster (Gears)they go crazy, while the rich(PS3)eat plenty everyday
@alster Just shut up...
@Strike stfu because you obviously have not played GT5. Also it was not made it fraction of the time.
@Turn10 comment about weather not making a difference? Obviously it does or they don't know how to implement it. Just look at GT5
No CoD was 'sucky' on PS3 other than FagOps. The ones made by IW are 99.9% identical so stfu. The only way you could argue it's better is that map packs come out first for 360.
But you can't blame developers too much for that, they can't really control it since it's based on real life
This is a duplicate post from 2 days ago
Gosh... Even the menus look the same. The music is not much different. 80% of the guns are the same as the last game. They still have AC-130, same reused perks, How is this a new game?
Their next console might just be called Kinect360.