CRank: 5Score: 20760

Total Trash. dont bother

1135d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Absolutely not. The Open world version is incredible, it plays like butter, the exploration is top notch, even after your done with it all you can still jump in and appreciate the vast openess and ease of exploring. They made such a awesome template to work with that im not surprised a whole new game isnt being built on top of what they already have done as it seems like a perfect map to readjust and plop in enemies and we are good to go for another round

1142d ago 2 agree16 disagreeView comment

the game plays horribly and looks awful as well

1153d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

this game is pure trash in every way. i cant believe they have the nerve to charge money for this

1157d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

dont bother, its unplayable

1157d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

horrible in every way, and this street urban stuff is getting old, stale and corny

1162d ago 13 agree6 disagreeView comment

just let it go..

1168d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView comment

yes yes yes

1168d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

you are delusional

1187d ago 7 agree14 disagreeView comment

its way overpriced but people here will defend it somehow

1187d ago 11 agree14 disagreeView comment

at 399 it still wouldnt be adopted, this thing is doa

1187d ago 8 agree32 disagreeView comment

DOA

1187d ago 10 agree14 disagreeView comment

but if it was ps5 only wee wouldnt be hearing this

1198d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

scorn is trash

1200d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

this reviewer is smoking crack

1200d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

the game is trash

1200d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

exactly what it looked like, a 4 or 5 out of 10 and here we are

1200d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

it looked like crap and we all knew it and here we are

1200d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Gamepass can save it

1207d ago 0 agree8 disagreeView comment

all other ps5 games 1 year later on pc or people gonna ignore that

1216d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment