CRank: 5Score: 54330

Well supposedly there will be demo's available tomorrow running on both the PC and PS3 (of the multiplayer map operation metro "confirmed") so we'll probably get a rough look of the graphics the consoles are capable of, ps3 at least ;)

5346d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why do you think they announced BF3 being demo'd on PC and PS3?? They said there will be a playable multiplayer map (including PS3 which is showing the console graphics basically) of the metro level on the show floor tomorrow, so hopefully we get to see some more gameplay and how it looks on the PS3 (guess xbox will have to wait) :D

5346d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Well I hope they don't so Battlefield can crush COD and show gamers what a true FPS experience is all about! (coming from a guy who plays battlefield)

5347d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Kinda happy their adding team deathmatch. Sqaud death wasn't really that action packed or fun, and didn't even require teamwork, just camp in the building or spread out. Team deathmatch will be the same but on larger scale, like conquest but without the flags. Lets hope they design the maps in a way to have huge firefights between each team :)

5347d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Rushed means they drop whatever their doing currently and focus non-stop on the next console to get it out as soon as possible, that's rushed. Not sure how long it takes to make a console but Sony/M$/Nintendo all work on them little by little throughout their current systems. You think Nintendo just started working on Cafe this year?? No, they probably have been working on it for years, probably 2-4. Sony is saying their not gonna go all out on the PS4 yet just because Nintendo's new ...

5347d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Wow I'm officially super excited to see this thing and its capabilities! New Mario, Pokemon RPG?? HELL YEAH! and those worrying about the price point, I'm guessing it to be $400+, this is next gen people. If people payed $500-600 on a PS3 5 YEARS AGO, then they would definitely pay $400+ now for a next gen console, Nintendo nonetheless.

5347d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

hmm well it may have slowed down but we all know the only reason for that is the PSN being out,common sense it would drop sales. However its after this E3 that might make them go back up to speed, which is what we're all saying, how can each console make the most out of the remaining years before next gen and I don't see M$ really pulling out major game changers. Perhaps they don't need them now, but a lot can happen in 2 years.

5347d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@ Topic title
...no.

5347d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Whoever wrote this article is an idiot!

5347d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I don't think sequels will help M$ this year (or E3 if you want to narrow it down to 1 week) Their gonna have to announce something big and new. Sure Halo 4 will sell a lot but its not gonna get NEW customers to purchase a 360 since they already know what to expect from their games.

This is why Sony is catching up in the 1st place, their bringing out new IP's that attract new customers, simple as that. I think Kinect will be the biggest selling factor over M$'s s...

5347d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

now why would they have Resident evil 4 (avatars) on there hmmmm? Might hint at the HD remake coming soon :D

5347d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Actually Halo 2 was the best pound for pound, Halo Combat evolved is always dear to our hearts though since it started it all.

5347d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

sorry but they have been making a halo game almost every year since Halo 3 :/

Halo 3, Halo wars, Halo ODST, Halo reach, and now Halo CE HD remake. I hope they put some quality work into Halo 4 and release it on the next gen console (which should be about 2 years)

5347d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Isn't COD Activision's only game to be shown that's popular? So how could they "win" with just one game? If any publisher has a chance at "winning" its Bethesda with all their games coming out. and if this is about COD and not Activision, then they certainly won't win. Sure COD's bound to get attention, but not all of it will be positive from the words spreading around about their elite service. and if they show multiplayer it won't matter since Bat...

5347d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

aaaand I don't know why you guys always say the same thing about "idk E3 was a competition?" Of course its not, not officially labeled on E3 anyways. Its us consumers who made this whole game up. Whoever puts on the best show "wins" People are gonna like one companies conference better than another and that's fact, which is what we make of the whole show. We know its about games and other cool tech, but why not throw in a few bets to make it interesting? ;D

5347d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Wow that's pretty sad, I love Sony and insomniac too but to get mad about a new IP being multiplat is just stupid. Now if they made resistance on the 360 then I'd be pretty pissed but its a new IP so why get angry at all? Plus developers are bound to take in other companies to make more money (mass effect/MGS) so if that means making better games with that money, then so be it. Be a gamer, not a loyalist.

5348d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

noooo its because most of us play on consoles, not pc, so we wouldn't know what comes out for it. Heck, most people didn't even know what Crysis was when Crysis 2 was announced for consoles. I bet most people don't know what interstellar marines is just because PC guys NEVER talk about how great their exclusives are.(or a reason to own a PC besides better graphics)

5348d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

of course it will be dumbed down, it was made for PC, however it will still give the same experience as PC on consoles, just look less pretty. You must have your head in the dirt if you think console graphics are bad, they are more than enough to have a great experience in gaming.

Nobody likes a PC elitist

5349d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

sorry but I was talking about external features. Little features like that don't make or break a buy, which is why Dsi should have had it since it had online, common sense put in those extra features. PSP wasn't tailored for touchscreen which is why they didn't want it in (btw a friends list is old so your 3DS should have been had that! hell nintendo just jumped on board for thumbsticks! wake up!) I've wanted the 3DS as much as the next guy, but after learning every corner aro...

5349d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

3DS IS just an updated DSi, don't give me that "oh it has e-shop and a friend list, you don't know what your talking about!" NO, that stuff should have BEEN in the DS. It's not a SIGNIFICANT upgrade from the DSi is what Sony is trying to say, just adds 3D,a thumbstick and features to go with the 3D.

NGP has 2 new thumbsticks, 3D enabled, touch screen on front AND back, cross-platform play,3G,bluetooth connectivity,front camera,rear camera,sixaxis motion,...

5349d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment