Unfortunately, the Switch will not have access to all the great games coming out for the other consoles.
Every system is a must have, if for nothing more than a just in case scenario.
Monopoly? Yeah my parents taught me that game at 5 along with raising me to know the benefits of financial freedom. Monopoly is one of my favorite games, btw. Lol Yes I have made millions, sir, would you like if I showed you. Be careful, it could stifle your scepticism and create a level of resentment towards the fact that you could have done more than play games. I built my wealth through opening a chain of video game stores, liquidating them to spearhead 3 new companies. Currently, I am sta...
There is no arrogance in what I stated. Those are the options in the industry, so you either use them or you don't. Period. Yes I buy everything that I want to experience, like all responsible adults do. I've never complained about anything that I don't have anything to contribute towards the change. That is just crying. You're free to label me as you will, because at the end of the day, you'll still have to buy everything necessary to get your desired result. Lmbo No amou...
Who gives a s*** about PR? If it's truth, say it. I've made millions without sacrificing an ounce of my principle foundation. If you don't like it, deal with it.
Comsumers/Developers alike have this entitled mentality that they deserve more than what is earned through contribution. Furthermore, our purchase of games is selfish at most, because if it wasn't initially entertaining to us we wouldn't consider investing. Question: Does your investment portfo...
When you pay for your games, you get them, right? End of story. It's not like you're investing your money into Sony with no return. Smh How about all of you crying about cross play, pony up some of your own capital to make it happen. I'm sure all of you will get quiet then.
"For the Gamers" means entertainment that appeals to them, not building an infrastructure which costs millions to maintain and give it for free? Did you not notice the charge for PSN, now?
Who cares about simple? What's simple for you is likely more complicated for business, making it ultimately bad for business. Think about something outside of yourself and what you want, perhaps then it will all make sense.
Yeah, much like 1% of the worlds wealth is controlled by few, but that doesn't keep people from pursuing it. So....let's measure common sense for a moment, you don't want a PS4 yet you want to play with people who did want one?!?! Also, ...
It has to profitable in order to be considered, but since gamers want to be entertained beyond their means already, Sony knows you'll just want it for free. I'm sure the deal to allow Epic the luxury was met with something gained for Sony. Smart business, everything good for the entertained gamer is BAD for business.
Their game got released on their platform, so that should be enough. It would seem that mooching has affected developers as well. Smh
Good job.
The best solution is to buy an Xbox, PS4, and a Switch. Sony doesn't owe you anything. The ONLY reason Micro & Nin are implementing it is because they're both way behind Sony.
Furthermore, it's only a disaster to people looking to gain something for nothing. These companies need to start telling these entitled type to f*** off. What have any of you contributed besides buying games, which is paying for YOUR entertainment? If entertained adequately enough, the...
On moochers want cross play with systems that they don't own, period. Entitled do nothings always crying about what they don't get for free. Hell go create your own network service and perhaps you'll get closer to your desired goal.
Who gives a crap about cross play? Man up and get all the systems if you want to play with other people, stop trying to get something for free. I swear, if you're too broke to afford it, maybe a reevaluation of your priorities is in order. So tired of hearing the input and opinions of non contributors.
I'm currently playing it, and I'd have to say that Batman and Shadow of Mordor have more solid combat. I haven't played too deep into the story yet though.
Smash is the playground version of anything with real substance. I've played fighters for upwards of 20 years, and Smash equates to a glorified king of the hill game. Take the current system and place it in the same formula as a Guilty Gear or Street Fighter, what you'll see is it could not compete. Soul Calibur has the same option to ring out your opponent, but it is also builds a system that allows for other means of victory. Smash is popular because it's so casual that a child ...
No online browsing.
No voice chat.
No messaging.
No friendlist.
No backwards comparability.
The 7 year old Vita says hello. Lol
Every game on this list is awesome. People fail to venture into new and different experiences, so forget what any of these people are saying. Your list is your list, as theirs is theirs.
PSN: SurgicalMenace
Mine is a VERY long list, but a great one. I DO play everything, as a hardcore, that is the point. Limiting oneself to only certain genres is casual a gamer as they come. Again, great list.
On the go or not, as long as Nintendo continues to develop their consoles behind the curve they will never become viable amongst serious gamers again. Think about it; for every first party game that does well, there are a large volume of AAA 3rd party games that do well also. Without the option to play those 3rd party games, Nintendo, will continue lack any lasting appeal to the gamers desiring to play them.
Even with more than one system, if there are 30 great 3rd party g...
Yes they are, if they are not adding to your life. 900 hours of Skyrim can be time invested into learning a new skill that adds to you. I only play games as a release, offering nothing more to them than a very small portion of my day, anymore.