I wonder who actually plays this. Is it even a game?
So that's what Sev would look like if he was on the PS2 lol.
I'm just joking, don't kill me.
Whether if it's a dominant console or not, it's your decision not a fact.
You just did lol
I'd understand though. A lot of people cant afford buying all the great titles the PS3 offers.
Home wont be in trouble. Home is on the PS3 and the avatars are on the 360, how would it hurt Home if it's on a different system? The only thing that will hurt are the consoles itself but that is highly unlikely. Who would buy a 360 or PS3 system just because of the avatars or Home?
A game doesn't need to be realistic in order for somebody to enjoy it. Not to mention this is Call of Duty, not ArmA.
I agree, MW2 should have spears and sling shots instead /s.
What a disgusting attempt from IW to lure the teenagers who think this is "cool".
I would care a little less if I wasnt playing as a damn terrorist.
Not the best place to advertise dude. Mods, do your thing.
CoD isnt about graphics but more of gameplay, besides, unless if you count the pixels, it's hardly distinguishable betwen 6XXp to HD. Like GTA 4 PS3 and GTA 4 360 for example. It's said that the PS3 has a 630p native resolution, but it's hardly unnoticable when compared to the 360 versions 720p.
Nai, it's sub-HD so you're half correct
If any of you have not played God of War yet, this your chance! I've only played the second one like a million of times, and I can just buy teh first one for 20$, but with HD graphics, 60FPS, anti-aliasing and trophy support, the extra 20$ is well worth the purchase.
I'll be playing Uncharted 2 multiplayer. Once you get good at it it's so much funner to play ( it's still fun playing as a newbie). Just got out of a game with a 28:1 ratio :).
I'll be picking up MW2 during the holidays, perhaps buy it used since I'm not in the mood for giving Activision my cash.
From the article: "World at War is a pretty good and best COD yet". I agree that W@W is a good CoD game ( although the tanks really made me hate the game), but ...
Comming from a user with the name Halo_Reach... why am I not surprised...?
It has come to this I see. First it was "too expensive" and now its too cheap. Wow...
The problem with the headset being bundled with the 360 is that anyone can just plug it in and start chatting. Which may be beneficial to some but can have a negative effect as well. If a 12 year feels like ruining the experience of another he/she will grab the mic out of their 360 box, plug it in and start saying racist statements. As with the PS3, the 12 year old kid will have to go out and buy a blutooth headset, which is probably unlikely for a 12 year old to do.
What a horrible analogy. At least think of something better.
Two times bigger as in twice the people? I doubt that, if you look at the sales gap between the PS3 and 360, the PS3 is not twice as less as the 360, which already indicates that your statement about there are twice as many LIVE users than PSN is BS. I could bring up the fact that not all 360 owners have LIVE, but then, PSN has its own problems with multiple PSN accounts.
but why pay 50$ when you can play it for free (on PS3. Sure, some may say it's a "better community", but is it worth paying for?
MW2 will be pirated as hell no doubt.