Starlins

You're biased and delusional.

You think it's just a big coincidence that this statement happens on an xbox YouTube the right when it goes on game pass... I mean, I must be delusional to think Microsoft might offer kickbacks to developers who say things that benefit them or hurt their competitions.

I mean, after all, the whole world advertises for free. And, if there is one thing Microsoft is known for it's their altruism, and totally not mon...

I am a huge fan of Vanillaware, and I can't wait to play a refresh of this classic.

I hope it comes west.

"So why have I never seen a company come out and say how great adding themselves to PS Plus was for the title at hand, but this is the first time I've seen someone publicly criticizing the outcome of being, just, on PS Plus?"

Have you noticed that this was posted on an xbox youtube?

I would answer your question with "$$$".

The benefit is keeping all Dual Senses on the same software revision, so they don't have to worry about compatibility when adding new features in newer games.

Even if PlayStation games weren't going to PC they would still want to sell the best controller on the market to PC gamers.

There is a reason why Steam added and so many games on PC supported PlayStation controllers even before PlayStation games started going to PC.

TLOU 2 is a 20+ hour, highly polished single player game. Halo: Infinite is a 6 hour, average game.

Halo: Infinite has a basic 90's style multiplayer with bare minimum content. Meanwhile, what we have heard about the TLOU multiplayer is that it's going to be a huge open world campaign.

No, it's exactly the same.

If you don't think they are getting kickbacks for doing advertisements for Microsoft, then it's you who doesn't understand how the world works.

It's your own double standards getting in the way.

Have you ever seen an infomercial where people tell you how miracle spring water changed their lives?

That's not true.

I disagree.

One might say it's hard to believe, even. It's a real shame Microsoft doesn't give accurate numbers, huh?

You're wrong.

Oh, pardon me, it went out of beta a week ago.

Unlike Sony's Software, which has had thousands of people working on it across multiple developers and tweaking it and improving it for multiple generations.

UE5 isn't even out of beta.

They actually have no say in what Epic does.

Tencent does not control Epic. Epic is controlled by Tim Sweeny.

And I have not heard of any instance of Tencent trying to exert any control over the decision making.

Nor did you explain why Tencent would want to work against PlayStation, or why they would legitimately want to block an arrangement. Instead, you made generalizations with a negative undertone about what Sony may or may not do...

Made up numbers.

What does Tencent have to do with anything, except for being a boogie-man name to throw around to scare people into agreeing with you?

Tencent recently opened an American Studio in LA called Lightspeed to make games that will be on PlayStation consoles.

Or were you just trying to make Sony look bad again?

As far as I know, Microsoft hasn't invested money in Epic, I can't find any articles on Google that talk about them investing in this or any other Epic project.

They backed them in their case vs Apple (which personally I hope epic loses) and that seems to be the only thing I see that ties them together.

I really don't get it.

Sony has their own in house software that is far more mature than UE5. I can only assume they hope this will push VR which they are heavily invested in.

@Knushwood Butt

Of course he hasn't.

And of course if it was a Microsoft game, he would be defending it.

Microsoft has been shoving MTX in every game since 360, these same guys have been defending it for years, now all of a sudden Sony has a game with them, and now it's time to start complaining.

And of course lets not talk about the fact that the game will get free updates for years like GTSport did.