Helghan jungle /=/ earth jungle
Oh Reginald...
Hey, maybe you just forgot what the concept art looked like
http://i47.tinypic.com/291y...
I forgot what the concept art looked like too, came in expecting spider plants 'n' shit
best looking console fps game yet!
Edit: check out the jealous stealth disagreers in this thread :D
You know a game's good when it gets a guy so riled up he makes 3 accounts to disagree with positive comments
@Munky: Or in a 2. Either would be true :)
I'm sorry you couldn't enjoy what is the best console racing sim :/ Btw it wasn't even in production for 6 years. Don't know where you got the extra year from :S
"Killzone is nothing but a shiny postcard with broken controls"
WRONG.
All?
You're an idiot. GT5 and many other console games use HDR lighting - in fact GT5 runs at 60fps.
People are saying it looks disappointing because crysis promised that it would have the best graphics of any console game... What we got was so far from that it was ridiculous.
WOW! That KZ3 pic looks amazing. But I doubt anyone here genuinely thinks Crysis 2 on consoles looks better than that mate.
Takes time to make the best console simulator :)
"things won't improve on dated hardware"
Wrong.
KZ2 -> KZ3
UC1 -> UC2 -> UC3
All big graphical improvements, all look better than Crysis 2 which is definitely not what the developer promised. There are a lot of better looking console games than this.
@jsonhenry
Crysis 2 is not the best looking game being released and Killzone 3 looks great for a game on any platform. Not just on consoles.
"Nintendo is known to have quality hardware"
Nintendo Wii.
Your argument is now invalid.
@ below: Reliability is quality just as much as capability is quality. The Wii has very low capabilities in terms of
-Online functionality
-graphics performance
-controllers
etc.
Yup, I sure did. It's called a "counter-argument"
I agree wholeheartedly, more multiplats on PC (goddamn RDR) means better hardware over time. Which will benefit the next gen of consoles.
With your last statement I think you missed my point. If you really care about graphics that much, you are less of a gamer for it. Games can be great despite their graphics (case in point: many console games are far better than crysis, yet none look better)
I'm guessing you quoted the wrong part of what I said?
and of course what I said is my own personal preference, what else would it be? lol
If you want something that applies to everyone then it's plain to see that PS3 exclusives generally receive more awards/higher ratings than multiplat games, which is what the PC platform is for if we're honest here. Whether you personally agree with these ratings/awards is your own opinion.
"If you guys really cared about games you would petition Sony to develop games for PC instead of forcing you to buy a closed-box consoles to play games that are hailed as looking amazing when they really are only 720p linear-level shooters with deferred lighting and poor anti-aliasing."
Wow ok, well if PC gamers REALLY cared about games then they would ditch their platform for consoles, as they're all missing out on the best games of this gen (console exclusives...
@ psychic waffle
There are quite a few people constructively criticising here, look towards the bottom half of the page.
Well you can never have all the assists turn off in Forza
( http://www.youtube.com/watc... ) but I see what you mean. Me too :) shame I don't have a wheel that works with forza (Went for the G27, really big shame it doesn't support it)
I agree with the sluggish interface bit but I found Forza's cars to interact more like bumper cars than GT5...you sure you don't mean GT5 prologue...
That's fine everyone has their preferences dude, as odd as it may be it's just an opinion at the end of the day :)
Some people just prefer arcade games over simulators, hence why you prefer Forza over GT5. I too think GT5 can be a little overwhelmingly realistic at times whereas forza with it's 'off' handling physics and unrealistic understeer, oh and of course the permanent driving aids
literally wtf?