Seems logical to me not to release these titles in the US. While I'd love to play several of them, the fact of the matter is that they'd be niche titles only and wouldn't make enough for Nintendo to invest in.
Wow, here's a site that gives Galaxynextdoor.com a run for it's money in terms of awful writing...
Review score is fine, but you guys need an editor.
And here I thought she might have left him after she played Fable III... ;)
It's reviews like this that will never warrant support from good PR companies.
Did anyone actually proofread this tripe? Was this written by a fourteen year old with a thesaurus? Did they even PLAY the game?
Good lord, this is where the world of gaming journalism is headed - to Hell. Sites like these need to be shut down for good...
Here's a thought for a new article:
"Peter Molyneux: I Need to Prove Myself"
Honestly, this man needs to retire and stop releasing over-promised, under-delivered garbage. Each and every Fable game has been, ultimately, a shameful let down, a sad and pathetic release that only serves to remind us that we shouldn't trust Mr. Molyneux or his studio.
Why review a free group of apps? Is there really a need for this kind of crap journalism?
On topic, I wasn't expecting greatness from these apps. It's not like any of this motion gaming nonsense is going to remain prevalent in the next few years...
Wow, the writing at that site is really, really bad. We're talking "Galaxynextdoor.com" bad...
Apart from that... the Vita is very impressive, but I hardly think it's going to be the greatest system ever. Sure, it can play games that are comparable to a console title, but honestly... is that what portable gamers want? A console experience?
I don't think so. I think that's where Nintendo has an advantage. Granted, it's their only...
Given how this would be something that would blow the lid off of E3, Square would want to keep it under wraps. Emailing an individual and being so upfront - yeah, this isn't real at all. They'd never risk being so upfront with all of this information. In fact, considering the letter is intended for someone to doing translation, they wouldn't need as much information as they did.
From a PR standpoint, that letter does everything wrong... and then some.
While this "journalist" had some very valid points, the fact of the matter is that this game is CLEARLY not a 2.5... and just the fact that this sad and pathetic excuse for a review is up and touting said score indicates that it is, indeed, fishing for hits.
That having been said, it was a terrible review overall. Poorly written and designed only to incite people. Which is has.
In a way, I wish he'd revamp his format. While still humerous, it's gotten a bit stale...
I caught that as well... seriously, how pathetic on their part...
If he had any shred of integrity as a journalist, which is a term I use loosely, as he's one of the worst writers I've ever had a chance to see in this business, he should at least acknowledge the fact that he is in no way responsible for this addition to the MK series.
As others have pointed out and many of us who were at E3 already know, Kratos being added to MK was already known PRIOR to the suggestion by HHG.
I find it loathsome that someone would...
This is some of the worst "journalism" I've ever had the misfortune to read. What I thought might be an interesting article, turned out to be nothing more than some truly sad, uninformed raving that is, for all intents and purposes, not even correct. I suggest that the writer check the facts on the technology before spewing this sort of not relevant nonsense.
And get an editor or proof your work. I've ranted about poor writing on game sites before, but you,...
Fantastic review. It's great to see someone appreciate this game!
Great article! Amusing read, completely.
I went back and wasted five minutes of my life reading that "review" and guess what?
It's still filled with grammar and syntax errors. Surprise, surprise.
Go ahead and "LoL" at me. I'm not going to cry over it. If you're source for gaming information is this kind of crap, feel free to enjoy it.
Also, the score is incredibly unjustified. Period. Sorry, but did you actually play the game?
Lastly...
Expect this game to be anything short of horrible?
On the whole, the launch lineup for Kinect is lackluster at best. Out of the two games I've managed to pickup, only one of them was enjoyable.
The rest, that I rented, were garbage.
"GoldenEye is a name that most games not only know very well, but love."
I stopped reading there. Yet again, another site that proves that gaming journalists are illiterate buffoons.
Why is it that almost every "gaming site" has writers that seem to cater to an under 12 crowd?! Good lord, some of us ENJOY gaming and are OLDER than that...
Get an editor... or better yet, shut your site down.
This isn't what you people think...
It's more than likely what Malicious said - it's a compilation of Sonic Adventure, Crazy Taxi and quite possibly Virtual On.
Which is lame.
What a ridiculous article. Of course those games will never make it stateside - Nintendo knows full well that they'd never recoup their costs. Every one of those titles would be appreciated by a niche market only.
Honestly, this has nothing to do with alienating fans, it has more to do with the tastes of American gamers and the fact that these titles, while I would personally like to see them, would fare poorly in the American marketplace.