@T9X69 That screenshot is GT5 Prologue. I saw that annotated screenshot when forza 3 first came out. GT5 is 100 times better than that screenshot.
The ps3 includes SPUs (8 of 'em), which when combined, are only matched/outperformed by a desktop pc with core i7 with very fast triple channel memory. So you see my friend, it is real. Its not always the cpu and the graphics card, the ps3 has something that even the alienware doesn't have (not saying alienwares are slower, they're awesome!), the CELL. Its high tech technology which also powers one of the fastest super computers in the world, the IBM Roadrunner. It consists of 122...
I still don't know why so many gamers are whining about damage models of cars in the game. So you wouldn't buy the game if it had no damage? And while racing, do you stop to observe the damage models of the cars or try to stay on the road? I agree that GT5 is an awesome looking game and it will really be tempting to observe the environment around. But damage? Imo its almost as ridiculous as whining about the way you die or fall down after you death in a game such as Uncharted 2. Do yo...
You wanna know what sad? This article.
Looks interesting. The tech seems good as well. And knowing nintendo, this will sell like hot cakes (or like the ds lol)!
Its not only organising; you can buy full games on and download it directly to your hard drive from the steam store. So its basically to edit digital distribution.
Is this article supposed to be a joke? Because its not really funny.
Its more like a virtual gaming platform. On the pc, when you have steam installed, and you buy a game on it, the game files are downloaded onto the pc hard drive and installed on the pc itself. However, you can't play it normally like a pc game. You have to access the game via steam; opening steam and going to your games library and then selecting the game you had bought and downloaded. You can also place a shortcut on your desktop or wherever on your pc to play the game, but whenever you...
What people don't get is that Sony can't straight away implement X Game Chat. There is a legal issue. Microsoft has patented the x game chat service on live so sony cannot copy it. They have been trying to deliver x game chat but in another form, but i think its taking them longer than they would have wanted. One way is to provide skype on ps3, so players can communicate with each other via skype, whilst playing different games.
Thats true. The first kinect trailer did feature a family playing some racing game whilst sitting on the couch. But imo half the things from that early trailer was what MS visioned for Kinect. They've showed so much (or so less) of Kinect's features, yet they haven't demoed scanning in objects into a game, which was in that early trailer. In reality, the early trailer had actors acting to a script and following a choreography. It was to show the public what Kinect (Project Natal t...
How bout you try naming some features that live has that both Psn and PS+ combined doesn't have?
I can name a few features that PS+ provides that live doesn't have (yet).
Its very blatant that this article is very biased towards Xbox live. The service hasn't been launched yet and people are writing articles about how much it sucks. Damn. Wait for it to launch first. You don't know what features are offered. And this article treats PS+ as a subscription that's similar to Live but its not. Its an optional service, and without it, you can still play online and do all the awesomes things you can do now on your ps3. Live charges for these functionality....
You've got a big mouth for a tranny
I read the PSN+ rundown and it read that its gonna cost $7.99 for 3 months: http://www.ps3center.net//n...
I guess i missed the part where it said for a very limited time. I myself found it weird coz i heard Jack say 17.99. Thanks for correcting Ex. Sorry guys.
Full details about the service hasn't even been revealed. Calm yourself down.
Did anyone notice something dodgy about the pricing. Normally for subscriptions, if you go for the long term tariff its more value for money. However, thats not the case for PSN+. $7.99 for 3 months or $49.99 for 1 year (12 months). If an individual decides to stick with the 3 months tariff, he will be paying approximately $32 ($8 x 4 three month periods of a year) for 12 months. Just something I found odd.
Well i don't think you can say that it doesnt offer what you need because complete details have not been revealed about the service yet. You never know, PSN+ could be exactly what you need.
The fact is that they did win. By announcing blockbuster sequels before E3, and still managing to give a better than decent press conference, it proves the fact that Sony won E3. The press conference is only a part of the E3 experience. You have to take everything into account. Imagine if sony hadn't announced thoses games before E3, but at the conference itself, would you be saying the same thing?
P.S. Nintendo did an awesome job at E3 as well.
The fact that Kevin Butler was there made Sony's conference the best out of the three. Im sold on move. Really impressed with Nintendo's conference though. 3DS looks interesting.
@TheTruthTeller Yh dude. Militant07 is right. Hz is the short form for Hertz, which is the unit for frequency. Frequency is 1/T i.e. per unit time. So when it comes to tvs, the frequency is significant in terms of frames. Hence, frames x 1/T = Frames per second.