Poor you and your inability to engage yourself.
Lol at the recycled counter arguments and disagrees. Sony could commit genocide and its nut huggers would still blindly kiss their ass.
At least with my 360 I didn't have to worry about my money being stolen.
The damn graphics engine isn't what makes the game good or bad.
You people have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to that anyway, but why make yourselves look more clueless by talking like it's the deciding factor?
The dime-a-dozen, rinse and repeat gameplay and price tag are what make the games lame, not the visuals.
It's also the principle of not wanting to upgrade to a more advanced engine despite the ridiculo...
Uhmm, why console footage? These games have their roots on the PC, and thus should be compared on the most powerful platform - the PC.
Neither game is out yet but I guess that statement is 100% facts checked.
Those aren't the only games Valve have ever made.
You not heard of half life, a genre-defining FPS?
Team Fortress, the predecessor to class-based team games?
I say you're quite young and spoiled.
No real gamer would say that.
Indeed. What difference does it make who's decision it was?
Valve's "nobody tells anyone what to do" worth ethic is incredible. More developers should adopt it.
Just look at the amount of creative ideas and success they've had as a result.
Oh yes, what a stupid decision. Not like they're still miles ahead of the competition in sales or anything.
Oh shit wait a second.
How does having less titles make them greedy?
Surprised and pleased, huh?
Do you mean to say that the new PSN will actually work?
More people listen to him than you. And he agrees with the professional reviews, of which more people listen to as well.
Wait, you've played Gears 3? I thought it wasn't out yet.
Also if anyone's played Crysis 2, they know the power of the 360.
Like all multi plats, Gears 3 wouldn't look as good on the Ps3.
Sorry but Crysis 2 is currently king.
They can never really be one independent entity with so many shit munchers out there who can easily claim to be in it.
Regardless, saying "it could happen" is irrelevant at this point. The only thing that matters right now is that it hasn't.
Actually the only difference is that one of the two is old news.
lol @ bakedgoods.
Still on the "OMG BIASED" bandwagon I see. Well, at least whenever the Ps3 version doesn't look superior. I have to say though, out of all the wild "this website is biased" theories I read on N4G, your reasoning is probably the most stupid I've seen.
I see little to no difference other than contrast levels. Except the detail in the background, which looks sharper on the 360.
@Warprincess116
So you'll buy more of the same rather than something new?
I'd say it's your money that's being wasted, but it's people like you who keep these guys in profit and starting dlc-pricing trends, not to mention the higher retail prices.
You'd think with all of the millions they made they'd be putting it into some new tech, but it looks like they'd rather hold onto the cash and just milk more money, w...
Buying their game, regardless of where from, will still be rewarding this kind of behavior from them. They still get the same cut.
I won't be buying this game even if it's £25. Haven't done since COD4. Battlefield is the superior series that doesn't try to milk its fans.