that makes the game unplayable? arent there games like that on 360 anyway? namely halo 3?.. and whos to say you would have to turn EVERYTHING down? my point is 360 can be optimised that may, it may need tweaking but nothing major! why do you think 360 is the lead platform so often? Its easy to dev for, as its just a low-mid range pc, isnt it.. Really im not sure of your point? You even said 360 is PC based.
i know you need a high end pc to run it, in all its glory! im not saying 360 could do that! but say you turn the framerate down, turn AA off or down, turn resolution down, the 360 could, are you saying it couldnt, at those settings? lol
i bet they wanna compete with k2, u2 etc, (on consoles).. now if they cant do that with the 360, they would have to use the ps3.. and from what they have been saying they like the cell, and they are saying they are impressed! time will tell, and if they are lying they will soon be found out when the game drops.
i mean thats my point, it doesnt matter what game it is, they can always turn things down or off, to get it to run on 360, with little effort surely? i mean if you have a basic pc that just about meets crysis requirements, you could run the game right? it wouldnt look great but it would run non the less, do you get me? ps3 needs to be coded differently, in order to use the spus, you see?
why? its only the case when it comes to 360 and ps3 too, i mean they make the pc the best it can be, and they dont dumb down the ps3/360 to be equal to the wii.. so wtf is going on? it doesnt make sense! its have the reason i buy very few multiplats, say what u want but ps3 is more powerful, look at k2, u2, mgs4, gt5, heavy rain etc, the proof is in the puddin! so my point is why dont multi devs use the extra power? lazy? paid off? i wonder.
so all they need to do is adjust the settings of the pc version, to a level that the 360 can handle, surely? isnt that logical?.. the ps3 however is completely different, and it seems the guys at crytech are very impressed with it.. i only hope they mean what they say, and you know what i do believe them, cos looking at crysis its clear they want thier game to be the best it can! could this be the first real multiplat to judge console power by? hmmmm
if there message was thier both the same, and the message were true, why didnt they release both versions REAL pics? what are they hiding! the fact is they are lying to one or the other! are you happy being lied then? well more fool you! doesnt mean your a fanboy, just cos you dont like lies!
however if i was id defo not get it now! if it wasnt bad enough that they sold out this gen, doing shady things like this should never be rewarded.. truth is though. everyone here will still rush out and get it regardless, this sends the message that they can do whatever they like! hit them where it hurts! there pocket! if you must buy it, get it pre owned!
uncharted 2 did and does have trophies! maybe the trophy patch is to add online trophies! your comment was inaccurate and useless, well done.
they just left it open, but obviously people were gonna think those games off the bat, cos its what most people want.. you wouldnt think ucharted 2, as it has trophies already, ign didnt lie but they were shifty!
anyway what do you care? i see you in nearly every ps3 thread, and you never have anything positive to say! so why the hell would i believe you? i will listen to my own logic and reason thanks very much! on topic, shame on you ign, just another reason to avoid you like the plague!
didnt you see i was being sarcastic, and taking the piss out of the people that gave you disagrees? lmao... nevermind...
no day and night cycle, worse graphics? why in gods name would i do that? now if MS puts something out there on uncharteds level, or killzones level, or heavy rains level, etc etc i might have considered it, but even then i think i would have passed! i know people scared to turn there damn console on! what kinda gaming is that? lmao... oh and also saying graphics dont matter, is like saying HD tv doesnt matter, i mean you can see the picture on sd right? so why get HD? its irrelevent! right? ...
i take it you still game on the spectrum then? oh wait you say you still play killzone 2? what you have a ps3? what for? graphics are irrelevent! i hate it when people say that crap! course we want better graphics! i mean OBVIOUSLY a game should first and foremost be fun and enjoyable, which killzone 2 is... but ONTOP of this it has awesome graphics! only topped by the unbelievable uncharted 2... why is that such a bad thing? why shouldnt i go for that game over say mw2? a game is a complete ...
2 people know your lying! not only that they know where you live! lmao... oh and i see omega (who told me he is butthurt that sony lost exclusivity of final fantasy, this is why he trolls every article now) is still at it, look dude let it go, you can still play your beloved final fantasy, so really what is your problem? how many exclusives have MS got? and how many have they lost? please just give it a rest now, thankyou.
at the end of the day im in a way agreeing with cwmr, the 360 is easier, plus devs have used pcs to develop for years, so they should hit the sweet spot straight away! And they did, but whats next, where can they go now? Honestly where can they go? How come forza only has 8 cars on track while gt has 16 and still looks better! Please id like someone to explain.. To the guys above, interesting stuff, thanks for posting.
look from my understanding 360 is pc based, as devs are used to that surely it would be easy for them to optimise the 360 right off the bat? no? and if they have, where will the improvement come from? you cant magic more power in there.. the cell is different and it takes time to get the best out of it, and i do believe the best is yet to come! and its already pretty damn good!
ok seriously now i have a few questions, i want a decent debate no fanboy nonsense, you say that sony made up how powerful the ps3 is, so how come we have uncharted 1/2, 2 lookin even better than 1, killzone 2, mgs4, there is nothing to match these on the 360 yet! however you say the 360 is easier to get the best out of it... but its been out a year longer! surely ps3 should be playing gfx catch up?
and you cant base an opinion of a game just on a demo! i wasnt impressed with dead space demo, but it turned out to be one of my faveourite games this gen! R.I.P Dead Space!
if its made like a pc and runs games like a pc, the question is what is the difference? apart from you cant upgrade a 360.. im saying with the 360 they just optimise it, then fix it at those settings, and thats it, maybe there is anti piracy specific to the 360 (not that it works lol) do you see what i mean now? i reckon 360 games are made on a pc! and 360 is a pc!