No conformation of that. Sony however definitely did say that they were thinking of a way.They said they have our data and will be looking into it. They never said 'No Transfer'. Their is no quote of them saying that.
Okay first of all he never said the PS4 is so lame so I am not sure what the title is talking about.Second of all that is the risk all systems are taking right now with gaming being done on phones and PCs which is why I think Sony is planning to link the PS4 to all different kinds of devices to expand their reach.
And finally it doesn't have that much of an impact as he says.Sure people will have to make PS4 games but with a easier system to work with they will be more e...
It's all good. I make my own judgements and my own decisions.I decide what I let slide and what bothers or doesn't bother me. Let the haters rage, snort, attack and make all the claims they want. We got a new console with new possibilities and it is real despite people claiming otherwise.No person has ever stopped me from buying what I want and it isn't going to start now. I let my instincts guide my gaming preferences and purchases and no stranger online is going to change that. ...
Still several months and game conferences to show the casing but that is all it is. The casing.The plastic case that all the stuff already announced will be housed in or plugged into
Not all of us can afford to buy two or three consoles. Some of us have to choose and stick with it. I can't be buying games for two different systems.Do you have any clue how much money it would be to buy a Wii U and PS4 and games to play on them? So we are not all tied by choice by by limitations
I would prefer if you guys did.I will understand if you can't but if you can please do. I won't rage if you can't do it but will be miffed if you can but won't.Any way you have several months to decide.I am not even mad about the lack of BC. If you think about it it really isn't your obligation to give us BC if you decide to move on.I will just do what I usually do. Either keep the old system for a while or sell it all and move on. Besides it is good to see that you are st...
Not sure why you are getting disagrees. That is hope enough that Sony isn't giving up on the VITA. Besides the PlayStation even was for the PS4 not the VITA. Notice that is all they talked about.E3 will be for talking about everything else. This was to introduce the PS4.Anything else would have taken time away from the PS4. I mean do you so called 'journalists' even read what you write down or do you just write any flame bait junk you can find?
Can't we at least wait until GDC or E3 to seeif they have more games? Why must you people be so impatient.The main point of the event was to introduce the PS4 not tell you about EVERY single detail and game. We have several months to know everything that needs to be known about the PS4 and them to make any changes or improvements to it.The Wii U started out with a whole bunch of ports and barely any first party and no one griped as much.Sony hasn't even indicated that this is all the ...
Yeah but who do you do that too and how do you stop them from telling anyone? Who in the who reviewing site do you bribe. Do you bribe everyone.What's to stop them from telling anyone else or blackmailing you? If you are found bribing reviewers your reputation is going down too. You see what I mean? If you think about it bribes don't make sense.There is nothing stopping anyone from telling someone you bribed them.So I am sure if you think about it cutting up games to make DLC isn'...
It didn't test my endurance at all. Sony got to the point told us their goals and plans showed us some awesome games showed us that third parties are supporting them and that they learned from their mistakes.They didn't go back to the hack or talk about sales or units or anything. And now they will have people hungry for more during the next several months and at developer conferences.they have everyone attention and people will be holding their breath at E3 and GDC just to find out w...
Just because it is his opinion doesn't make it any less lame. Saying it is your opinion doesn't make you opinion any more or less valid
But is that really 'blocking' used games and just the way things are becoming.I mean you don't claim Steam is 'blocking' used games because you can download them do you or the fact that you can already download several games on consoles. So how exactly does that boomerang back to Sony 'blocking' used games? They are just doing like everyone else is doing having physical and digital content to increase their sales. Is this suppose to be proof or something? Obviously...
I really don't think developers do this.They don't cut out content to sell it later. I think this is just something gamers assume like when they assume reviewers take bribes and when you think about it it makes no sense.I think cutting content out of a game sounds very inefficient and improbable.It is more likely that DLC is a different thing completely from a game. Despite what games say games are on deadlines and budgets and it is not as simple as they say to just give the game more...
What are you guys talking about? How do you figure Sony isn't blocking used game but has a way to? Where did you get that? They still have physical discs and you can download it if you want.No different then the PS3.So what are you talking about? Why are you still so eager to try and find evidence against the rumor? Whether they did it begrudgingly or because they realized the backlash it would cause who cares? The point is that they didn't block it. The end. Be happy. Until Sony and ...
Okay people.Don't spoil the game by starting to complain that Cole is gone and they choose someone else. All stories don't have to hang on to a character no matter what the cost. Maybe they though it was better to let Cole die or maybe he will be still around.We don't even know what ending this is the bad or the good one. It could be the good one where Cole is dead and Conduits probably still survived around the world or the evil one where Conduits were planning to be the dominant...
You haven't even seen all the games in action and you already know it isn't any better then Last of Us? And you don't know the point of this and that and you haven't even seen what it can do or how functional it is.And you think that ND didn't show a mind blowing game because we would forget about Last of Us? And you assume that these are the only games? You need to read over what you wrote and realize it is just a bunch of assumptions and gibberish. None of your reasons m...
Yeah we won't actually know that it better or not until we actually see the games in action. Watchdogs being on the Wii U doesn't prove it is as powerful as the PS4.Lots of third party games were on the Wii but they weren't even close to the level of PS3 or Xbox 360 games.Being on it doesn't mean it will be the best looking one.
PlayStation fans sure get confused easily.While any other system owner would conclude that it is still too early and they just weren't ready to show the physical console yet instead PlayStation people get confused.Can't people just use a little common sense?
Notice they wrote that no one from Sony actually said that.No actually quote from Sony.
Exactly. You can be totally offline and still play the console. They said that not too long ago. Get current.No one is forcing you to be social.It is just a feature like everything else.You never have to share anything or have anyone watch you do anything or join any teams.