I don't understand why they can't have both? Is there a technical reason behind it?
Top 3, right where he belongs.
Day 1 for me. This is awsome. They know how to reboot a franchise.
I would kill for a Conker
FUCK you EA! You haven't gotten this game right and it has been 20+ years. Pathetic!! Take a year off and get your shit right. Omfg Im pissed
Lol trolling my opinion. Sorry I forgot TF but I've never played day of defeat. But thanks for being butt hurt about games that I like :)
I love class based. BFBC2, KZ, BF2
Great PS3 deals going on
I think it's all preference. Competitive multiplayer really got me into video games and that's the main reason I play.
The first 151 until I die. These new pokemon characters are looking worse and worse, and more cartoony and non orignal.
I second that...
Seferoth, maybe you should try adding me on both xbox 360 and psn. I bet you will see you can. And you will see I was on my 360 the other day and the ps3 today. I made that comment because I would prefer more games from microsoft because there are barely any. I am glad the ps3 has more games and are of the same quality. I don't play companies, just games.
LOL @ that dragon picture
@seferoth
Well since you took the time to look at my profile I own both. And if you had any common sense at all you would take 46 games that have a 70 average score instead of 21 games with just a 3 point average higher score. Come on now son.
Looks awsome
Umm...I hope so, just to have more good games to play. I don't know, that's just me.
Well that was a stupid comparison. I would easily take 40+ 70 avg games over 21 73 avg games.
Gears of War did this as well. It's a good idea, I don't see the complaint. As long as they touch them up Im fine with buying classic maps.
I wish they would do this with all of the halo 2 maps.
Lol that was pretty good
This can't be it...