its look the same...but the 360 versions kinda had better lighting
yeah exactly..everones just going on about it having the ability to have more players....
killzone was just a desperate attempt to try and beat halo ...with the good graphics of killzone 2, everyones like ooo..its gonna awesome but killzone 1 sucked before(gamespot 6.9) so wht made u think we wanted more?
multiplat games are still made on the 360 and ported to the ps3 because its easier and cheaper..thts the mistake with the cell.using asymterical cores...hideo kojima said he was dissapointed with the graphics of mgs4 and it wasnt made to his original vision because of the cpu.ie the cell....he also said they pushed to its limit...so much for tht untapped power...and i know the xbox is less stable but tht doesnt change the fact tht its a better machine thn the ps3
do ur research before u come argue u noob...the ps3 was designed to be more of a supercomputer than a gaming console, like the way the Cell is designed(makes it bottlenecked)...the 360s hardware makes it a more superior console for gaming...thts why the 360 always gets higher framerates on multiplat games
hardware failure is not considered as something tht makes a machine inferior..the only better hardeware the ps3 has is a blu ray player...and its only better because of the large storage capacity...evryting else...the xbox owns the ps3
how can they win for hardware when its the most complicated and expensive thing for game developers????stupid idiot!!!stable my a**
so everytime xbox 360 wins something ur gonna call the site biased?...bunch of ps3 fanboys..xbox has better games thn ps3....and microsoft had a better conference thn sony.....ff13 going multiplat...tht was the biggest thing at e3...sony or nintendo couldnt top tht so grow up...bunch of morons..
yeah but were talking about exclusives
they burn more calories because they have more calories to burn thn brits
i dont think u understand whts going on with the ps3....in the table on tgdaily it says the ps3 gets up to 218 Gflops from the cell....but the thing is tht it was tested with all eight SPE`s...but as you already know....the cell does NOT use all eight SPE`s for games...during physical ingame testing the ps3 was able to pull off just 155 Gflops.
so then why dont u read the article from the link i posted..
dont get u started about the ram?as if it doesnt affect the performance of the cell...the ps3 is bottlenecked because there isnt enough memory...
http://www.rage3d.com/board...
now i expect u to read the whole thing!! and dont come telling me its a load of bullsh** because its a 100% fact
the xbox is more powerful
-sony removed 25%of the cells cpu power and 18% is lost to the os.....
once you have taken into account the total amount of resources that will be used by their respective operating systems, the ps3 ends up with less graphical and processesing power thn the 360
so how is he a fanboy if eveything he said was true?
-the ps3` cell processor is bottlenecked....meaning...it cant perform to its full potential..i dont expect ps3 fanboys to know wht bottlekneck is...look it up!!
-and its true tht the Xbox`s GPU(the xenos) is way better than the RSX(the gpu used in the ps3)...the xenos is based on Ati` sR600 gpu..like the one used in the Ati HD 3870...THe RSX is based on Nvidia 7800gtx...FOr those of u who dont have Rigs...a 7800gtx...
i wouldnt want a ps3 even if the piece of crap was the only console on the market...and another time...ppl dont have to try very hard to make the ps3 look like crap
but yeah god of war looks good
yeah it got like 6.9 on gamespot..
they dont look the same...all the ps3 versions look washed out or like they have been bleached or something...look again...and the 360 versions have much more textures(like the ground) and better colours...but other thn tht its the same