CRank: 5Score: 2130

Those names are a really cool idea.

Those are the gamertags of some of the developers, shows a person walking by that this is not just a shooter.
It is so much broader than that, infantry and vehicles.

5495d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

screw bf3. They decided to stick a 24 player cap on consoles meanwhile pcs get 64 players.

Bf3 on consoles = yet another gimped crappy battlefield.

We need new consoles already, ps3 and 360 are too old holding back games.

5495d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

250 is still a bit too much for a handheld. atleast for me.

I'll probably just wait for it to get down to 160-190 before I get one.

5496d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I remember seeing this story a few days ago this is a duplicate.

5496d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I can't wait. I hope its complex, deep and polished, and that consoles don't get shafted with a gimped version of the main game like we did with bf2.

We want more than 24 players online.

5496d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

if its cheap id give this thing a go, doubt it would improve my shooting skills but im just curious.

5496d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Or he just can't get into a bad shooter.

All of these people actually played a review copy, they can't all be wrong.

5496d ago 3 agree7 disagreeView comment

reviews suggest its not.

5496d ago 0 agree15 disagreeView comment

hopefully this means a new console in 2012 and halo as a launch tittle.

5497d ago 4 agree8 disagreeView comment

I don't understand the complaints, nobody here has played it, ign has.

How can you possibly think the game deserves a higher score , you never played it.

This just boggles the mind.

Gamers are just too entitled now and way too opinionated.

5497d ago 20 agree26 disagreeView comment

when its all done a ton of reviews will give this game a 7/10.

5497d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

credit url blog.seattlepi.com

hmmmmmmmm yea that sounds legit lol.

5497d ago 6 agree5 disagreeView comment

Gamespot, ign, gamestm,g4tv etc.

Legit review and video game websites and publications.

Not the blogs that claim to have review copies and most likely don't.

What most likely happened is these no name websites wrote a review made an educated guess as to what it would score and published it when the real review sites published their scores.

Never having actually played the final review copy of the game.

5497d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

the review is fine saga :/ All of these big name sites are coming up with that score. These people have actually played and reviewed kz3, you haven't yet.

5497d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

hahaha gunther is awesome. It's my love making music.

5497d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

7/10 is fair man. Still a good score, its as good as black site area 51 and fear.

Decent game but not top quality.

5497d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Score seems fair, I really don't know why people are freaking out.

Not one of the best shooters of this generation but it is still decent.

5497d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

How much money did Sony throw your way sev ?

We all know that score seems a bit padded.

5497d ago 3 agree5 disagreeView comment

hmmm instabull perhaps killzone 3 is just a 8/10 game.

All of the real review sites are giving it the same score.

remember 8/10 isn't bad, not every game can get a 10/10

not every game is duty calls.

However if you like the franchise get the game, don't let a mediocre review keep you from having fun, and expect the same with resistance 3 , insomniacs trackrecord is not good.

5497d ago 2 agree10 disagreeView comment

sounds like guerilla is making excuses this early for their shoddy online counter measures.

5497d ago 0 agree8 disagreeView comment