While I agree that it has great gameplay, it's still all opinionated. But the amount of content is undeniable, which is why I said maybe to that, because all the multiplayer features and modes are staggering.
Content-wise, maybe.
Gameplay wise, no. Not saying it's bad or anything, I love this game, but the gameplay isn't exactly AMAZING.
Like I said before, it's dumb - Move is obviously better, but seriously, why would that come to a surprise for anyone? It was made by Sony, and came out LONG after the Wii did. They had plenty of time to make it better than the Wiimote. A-dur-dur.
It's like bragging about how the PS3 is stronger than the Colecovision.
That's because unlike most reviewers, GT reviewed this game for what it was. Other sites will be like "Wii Music sucks because it's not up there with GEARZ OF WARZ!!"
Cut-scenes look awesome. The gameplay......is it just me or does it have this choppy robotic look to it?
True words. MMO's can''t be reviewed like console games. Every MMO starts off slow and starts heatin up once your kinda well into it with some proper gear and skills.
People are STILL going on about this? Seriously, anybody complaining about Samus in Other M is simply ignorant of the Metroid franchise, period. This isn't an opinionated matter, and disagree all you want, it won't change the facts.
Makes sense. No brain power went into thinking about this reboot.
They're the same franchises, but different experiences.
Mario Galaxy 1 & 2 are different from previous Mario games
Metroid Other M is completely new and fresh. Different from Prime and the 2D platformers.
Zelda Skyward Sword's combat is different and deeper due to WM+
Kirby Epic Yarn doesn't even had the sucking-up or puff mechanics
Same franchises, different experiences.
useless comparison
Naw, I can't see another Super Mario Galaxy on a home console. I think people would get tired of it by then. BUT, this IS Nintendo we're talking about, and they managed to keep the sequel fresh, so who knows. They're geniuses.
I would love to see a Super Mario Galaxy 3DS. That would be amazing.
I believe that Sony and Microsoft will keep going while Nintendo is the first to kick off the next gen. Now that M$ has revised the 360 and made a new model that is actually decent, they don't need a new console. Both the PS3 and 360 can have alot of things done through firmware updates and both are very powerful consoles.. The Wii's tech is a little dated though, the motion sensing is great but not perfected, and the online is not too great. So Nintendo will come out with their next ...
Fragile people. Nothin more, nothin less.
Anybody care to explain why they disagree? Lol. Oh, that's right, you can't.
Witchcraft!! Witchcraft I say!
Although they're the ones who put it in danger in the first place xD
Nintendo vs. Capcom please.........
What am I saying!? I can't speak of such awesomeness! Something as awesome as that should be forbidden!
The 3DS version has little-to-no jaggies, and the coloring is much more lively. Also, it looks clearer - the PS2 version looks a little blurry in some screenshots.
Graphics look great (for 360), but I just can't get excited for this game. They're not pushing it to the next lvl to me. Updated graphics, and beast mode, and that's pretty much it....the gameplay and animations look exactly the same.
To be social......