Good. Sounds like alot of bs with that game. I'd much rather just buy diablo 3.
Never really liked these games. I remember having one on n64 and not liking it. I don't think I've ever cared much for fps. It's gotta be a good one to get me, like a bioshock. Back then I'd much rather of popped mario, zelda, or donkey kong in.
Thanks to this review my interest is a more
It says Basic, uninspired turn-based combat, well thanks finally a turned based rpg that doesn't have some dumb weird gimmick just classic turn based woo-hoo.
Classic turn based(no gimmick), check
Towns, check
Talkable npcs, check
I'll be looking for this, I haven't played a game in this series
Eh, don't care much for any of the assassins creeds games so old school or so called rpg Era ones. Nah
Lol. I was thinking that. Hell even myself I clicked into this looking to see if it was on gamepass. Xbox is my gamepass machine while ps5 is my buying machine.
I meant to say xbox crashing lol. But refer to cyberpunk crashing my ps4 every half hour
Far as graphics they both looked straight to me. It's not always about the graphics dude. Game can be a graphical beast but if it runs like shit dhit it's useless
Hope they change the level cap by the time I get to play this. Wishful thinking on my part. I'm hearing good things about the game though
Oh gtfo. It runs better at release or 2 years after ?
Even if cyberpunk ran better at release the game was a broken piece of shit dude. Starfield is atleast playable without my ps4 crashing every half hour. I beat and platinumed cyberpunk on ps4 within release and it was a huge pile. I enjoyed the setting so much so I stuck it out. Cyberpunk is probably a fantastic game now sure but starfield has released in a better state no doubt. I've played both at release and s...
I'm enjoying it but in fallout I enjoyed reading computer stories and notes, stuff like that. This one kinda lacks in that area. Most of the books are repeats that I'm finding. The computers are few and far between which is worse imo then fallout considering its the future. Even the slates don't say much at all. I'm about 50 hours in. Its a huge huge game for sure let's fill it with stuff. I do believe some things will be updated, maps etc. I don't want it to sound i...
I didn't care for the first game. It felt real samey. Like it was pretty big and I'd be running through areas and felt I just went through that same area. Same reason assassins creed turns me off. Assassins creed wasn't as bad though.
Agreed. Good game. Way way way better the cyberpunk released. I swear it seems cdproject is trying to rewrite history. It's not good when anyone does it whether it's politicians or game developers.
Notellin
How you start your comment off tells me about all I need to know about you.
So far I'd give it an 8. I don't think starfield will die out though. I disagree there. It's a fun game minus your complaints(I agree with the complaints except the loading isn't a huge deal).
I'll try it on gamepass. As much as I know I'd enjoy this , all the dlc turns me off. It just doesn't stop , same with those new jurassic park games. I used to play Sim city 2000 and jurassic park genesis endlessly
I'm still interested. Ain't nothing wrong having to read things. I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out as an update if they get enough complaints. Sucks for collectors though
Ff7remake in all fairness is bigger then any of those games you listed. If square has obliged to ms its because ms desperately opened the checkbook
Sony and square don't have a bad relationship. Ms and square did sure. Far as ff7 remake even if it did come to square lol your talking ff16 losing sales. Probably a couple 100k on xbox but your hoping ff7r comes to gamepass. Can't you guys just buy some fking games
My pre teen plays it. I don't see much wrong with it. He knows no real money though. I know a couple things about it from him but it's actually got him interested in learning about gamimmmng b<7uilding/coding
Oblivion was exclusive to 360 more then likely because it was a bitch to develop for at first. Not cause why your thinking
To be fair to meta they show critic(websites) numbers and user numbers so you definitely can tell the real ones.