Bloody hell, 18 years ago.
That is the conclusion i have come to. It's like reviewers these days expect platformers to be easy or something.
It's not really her though.
SEGA, stop being idiots and just localize your game.
Actually they abandoned us.
I didn't say they didn't, but i can gurantee that they rush through the game. They don't allow themselves time to get used to it.
Stop comparing it with Mario, Sonic is unique, if people can't see that then that is their problem.
No it isn't. People are just bad at the game.
Jeez, it's like children. "Oh we can do just as much as such and such"
Pathetic.
Your opinion isn't valid seeing as you have never even played the game.
Whoever listens to reviews can't thing for themselves.
How can you say he is spot on if you haven't even played it ?
Sonic is not a lost cause, the people that complain just suck at the games.
Also, this article seems like it comes from some Mario fanboy.
Stop looking at Sonic's past and move the hell on, for once i would like to see a Sonic game reviewed by someone who doesn't feel the need to bring up the old days all the time.
These idiot reviewers play Sonic games for one day and expect to master it straight away, and when they can't handle it they blame it on the glitches or the controls. They are just crap at the game.
So you are moaning about the game before you even play it ?
Why do you people let reviewers decide what is a bad game ?
Yes and a bulk has been full of positive reviews.
Why are people only commenting on the ones with negative reviews ?
And another quetsion ? why do people take any notice of reviews anyway, they are just one persons opinion who has probably rushed through the game in a few hours.
Let them complain, usually when there is a crap review then the game is great. This is why i take zero notice of a review.
They could have given this game a 0 out of 10 and i would still get it. It has always puzzled me why people want other people to decide what a good game is.
Well this game will be great then if it's given a 4/10
God i hate reviews, they play the game for a couple of hours and think that they can give a fair opinion.
Why do they keep saying Sonic games in recent times have been poor ? It's just jumping on the bandwagon. Sonic Colours, Sonic Generations, Sonic Unleashed, these are Sonic's most recent games and apart from the werehog leves in Sonic Unleashed, they have all been great games.
They are always complaining about something. They knew how things were when they took the job so if they don't like it then they should get a different job.
You don't see me going on strike every year about my job.
Why is GTA 5 and the online part being reviewed as 2 seperate games ? nobody does it with any other game so i don't know why some are doing it with this game.
Also how can it be 10/10 ? the online mode is STILL having problems. It's not a surprise that people don't take reviewers seriously when you see reviews like this.